Crypto Ponzi Picasso: How Sam Lee Built a $1.7 Billion Digital Masterpiece of Fraud in Dubai’s Financial Wild West

By

-

May 19, 2025

An image of Crypto scammer Sam Lee now living in Dubai peddling new crypto schemes.

In a world where most tech startups struggle to reach unicorn status, Sam Lee quietly built a $1.7 billion empire with nothing more than promises, PowerPoint presentations, and an impressive ability to disappear right before authorities show up with handcuffs.¹ The Australian entrepreneur behind HyperFund – also known variously as HyperTech, HyperCapital, HyperVerse, and HyperNation depending on which regulatory agency was getting too close – has elevated crypto scamming from mere financial fraud to performance art.²

Dubai, with its gleaming skyscrapers and conveniently relaxed approach to financial regulations, has become the Broadway stage where Sam Lee and others perform their most daring heists, not with guns or explosives, but with something far more powerful: PowerPoint presentations about blockchain.³

The HyperVerse of Extraordinary Deception

When most children play make-believe, they might pretend to be astronauts or doctors. Sam Lee dreamed bigger. He created an entire executive, complete with an impressive CV and LinkedIn profile. The only problem? Steven Reece Lewis, HyperVerse’s supposed executive director with prestigious degrees from the University of Leeds and Cambridge plus Goldman Sachs experience, never actually existed.⁴

This imaginary executive was perhaps the most honest employee at HyperVerse, as at least he never personally promised investors returns of 5000% to 10000% daily on their crypto investments.⁵ These returns, according to HyperVerse’s marketing materials, would come from “large-scale crypto mining operations” that were about as real as Lewis himself.

The true genius of Sam Lee’s approach wasn’t just in creating fictional executives but in constructing an entire alternate financial universe where the laws of economics simply didn’t apply at all. In this HyperVerse, money could multiply itself through the magic of what financial experts technically refer to as “taking new investor money to pay earlier investors while skimming off the top”.

Why Dig for Gold When You Can Sell Shovels That Don’t Exist?

The beauty of Lee’s scheme wasn’t just its simplicity – it was his understanding of human psychology. While genuine crypto entrepreneurs were busy trying to solve actual technical problems, Lee recognized that the real money was in selling the idea of crypto wealth without the messy business of creating anything of value.⁶

“The brilliant innovation behind HyperVerse wasn’t technological -it was psychological,” explains Dr. Eleanor Richter, professor of Digital Economics at MIT and author of “Blockchain and Balderdash: A Century of Financial Scams Wearing New Clothes.” “Why spend millions developing actual mining infrastructure when you can simply tell people you have mining infrastructure? The return on investment is phenomenal – until, of course, it’s not.”

By early 2022, the inevitable happened. Like all Ponzi schemes since the original Charles Ponzi graced us with his financial wisdom in 1920, HyperVerse collapsed under its own mathematical impossibility. Investors who had been watching their digital balances grow exponentially suddenly discovered that the “withdraw” button on the platform had mysteriously stopped functioning.

Dubai: Where Financial Regulations Go for Vacation

Sam Lee didn’t choose Dubai by accident. The UAE has spent years positioning itself as a crypto hub, and unlike its conservative approach to social regulations, its financial oversight takes more of a “don’t ask, don’t tell, definitely don’t extradite” approach to crypto entrepreneurs with creative accounting methods.⁷

“Dubai has created the perfect regulatory microclimate for crypto schemes,” says Farid Hawthorne, former financial crimes investigator and current crypto skeptic. “It’s like building a nature preserve for financial predators. They’ve got luxury accommodations, minimal oversight, and a steady flow of fresh capital migrating through.”

The city has become such a popular destination for crypto fugitives that the Dubai Tourism Board is rumored to be considering a special visa category: “Financially Creative Digital Nomads.” Sources close to the matter suggest the visa would include express processing for those under SEC investigation and complimentary legal consultation on extradition treaties.⁸

Lee is far from alone in seeing Dubai’s potential. Ruja Ignatova, the “Cryptoqueen” behind the OneCoin scam, used Dubai to launder money and purchase luxury properties before disappearing entirely.⁹

“What Las Vegas is to gambling addicts, Dubai has become to crypto scammers,” explains Hawthorne. “What happens in Dubai stays in Dubai-especially your investors’ money.”

How to Spot a Crypto Scammer in the Wild

Identifying crypto scammers like Lee requires a trained eye. They typically travel in their natural habitat – luxury hotel conference rooms – and can be spotted by their distinctive markings: Patek Philippe watches, buzzword-heavy speech patterns, and an uncanny ability to use the words “blockchain revolution” and “paradigm shift” in the same sentence without irony.¹⁰

Their mating calls include phrases like “guaranteed daily returns” and “limited-time opportunity,” while their defensive mechanisms involve creating shell companies faster than a 3D printer on amphetamines.

The SEC: Always On Time, If You Define “On Time” as “After Everyone’s Money Is Gone”

The Securities and Exchange Commission, moving with all the urgency of a glacier taking a coffee break, finally charged Lee in January 2024 – approximately two years after HyperVerse collapsed and investors lost access to their funds.

SEC Director of Enforcement Gurbir S. Grewal noted with remarkable understatement: “This case illustrates yet again how non-compliance in the crypto space facilitates schemes.” This insight ranks right up there with other profound regulatory observations like “fire is hot” and “falling from high places can lead to injury.”

The Department of Justice joined the party with criminal charges that could see Lee facing up to five years in prison – assuming they can find him and pry him away from his comfortable life in Dubai.

The Resurrection Tour: Sam Lee’s 2025 Comeback Special

Most people charged with billion-dollar fraud might consider lying low. Sam Lee, however, views federal charges more as career stepping stones than deterrents.

In early 2025, Lee resurfaced in a series of YouTube videos outlining his five-year plan to bring the “mainstream global economy” onto blockchain technology. The plan sounds remarkably similar to his previous ventures, minus the word “Hyper” but with all the same promises of revolutionary returns.

“I’ve been cleared and am now indestructible,” Lee claimed in one video, apparently confusing “being released from temporary detention in Dubai” with “being exonerated of massive international fraud charges.”

Lee’s new venture, cleverly named “SatoshisTable.com,” follows the time-honored tradition of invoking Bitcoin’s creator to lend legitimacy to projects that would likely make Satoshi Nakamoto fake his own death all over again.

“The true brilliance of crypto scammers isn’t technical – it’s their audacity,” explains Marius Chen, blockchain security consultant. “Most people, after being charged with billion-dollar fraud, might consider a career change. Perhaps something low-profile, like librarian or a Safari wildlife photographer . But not these guys. They view SEC charges as just another form of free publicity.”

Celebrity Endorsements: The Cameo Economy

No self-respecting crypto scam would be complete without celebrity endorsements, and HyperVerse didn’t disappoint. The company featured videos from action star Chuck Norris and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak enthusiastically supporting the project.

The only minor issue? These weren’t actual endorsements but videos purchased from Cameo, the service where you can pay celebrities to say pretty much anything short of confessing to crimes.

“Chuck Norris doesn’t endorse crypto scams; crypto scams endorse Chuck Norris,” joked one former investor who lost $50,000 in HyperVerse before realizing that humor was the only return he’d ever see on his investment.

The Economics of Modern Ponzi Schemes

The financial ingenuity behind HyperVerse deserves some recognition. Instead of creating complex financial instruments like the masters of the 2008 financial crisis, Lee opted for a refreshingly straightforward approach: just lying about everything.

“Creating actual value is hard,” explains financial analyst Sarah Brockman. “Creating the perception of value is much easier and, in the short term, equally profitable. HyperVerse essentially cut out the middle man – that middle man being ‘legitimate business operations.'”

The economics work like this: Promise 1% daily returns (a mathematically impossible 365% annual return), collect investor funds, show growing balances on a digital platform, pay early investors with new investor money, and buy yourself a nice villa in Dubai before the inevitable collapse.

The Regulatory Game of Whack-a-Mole

As authorities in one jurisdiction close in, crypto scammers simply rebrand and relocate. HyperFund became HyperVerse became HyperNation, with each iteration designed to stay one step ahead of Google searches for “is [current Hyper-new name] a scam?”

“It’s like playing regulatory whack-a-mole with someone who owns the arcade,” says former SEC investigator Daniel Martinez. “By the time you’ve built a case against HyperFund, they’re already three name changes and two jurisdictions removed from where you started.”

This regulatory arbitrage is made possible by the global nature of cryptocurrency and the varying degrees of enforcement worldwide. While U.S. authorities were building their case against Lee, he was reportedly enjoying Dubai’s 365 days of sunshine and zero days of extradition.

The Next Generation: Crypto Scam Innovation

What makes the Sam Lees of the world truly dangerous isn’t just the damage they’ve already done – it’s what they inspire in others. Every successful scam becomes a case study for the next generation of digital fraudsters.¹¹

“We’re seeing Ponzi scheme evolution in real-time,” explains cybersecurity researcher Dr. Ayana Patel. “Each generation learns from the mistakes of the previous one. Today’s crypto scammers have studied what worked about HyperVerse – the community building, the affiliate structure, the technical-sounding whitepaper – while avoiding what got Lee caught.”

The next generation of scams is already emerging, with more sophisticated approaches to evading detection. Some are incorporating actual functioning crypto tokens with no real utility, legitimate-looking code repositories on GitHub with nothing behind them, and elaborate governance structures that exist only on paper.

Victims Left Holding the Empty Digital Wallet

While it’s easy to mock the absurdity of these schemes, the human cost is very real. Thousands of investors worldwide lost their savings in HyperVerse, many lured by promises that seemed to offer financial freedom.

“The most devastating aspect isn’t just the financial loss,” explains Dr. Monica Sharma, who studies the psychological impact of financial fraud. “It’s the loss of trust. Many victims become so cynical about all investments that they miss legitimate opportunities for years afterward.”

Recovery options are limited. Some UK investors may have recourse through their banks if they transferred funds from UK accounts, but most victims worldwide are left with nothing but expensive lessons and the faint hope that authorities might someday recover a fraction of the stolen funds.

The Eternal Return

As Sam Lee plots his comeback and Dubai continues welcoming financial fugitives with open arms, the cycle seems poised to repeat itself. New names, new tokens, new promises – but the same old scheme dressed in the latest crypto buzzwords.

“The tragedy isn’t just that these scams happen,” concludes Dr. Richter. “It’s that despite all our technological progress, despite blockchain’s potential for transparency, we keep falling for the same fundamental trick: the promise of something for nothing.”

As of May 2025, Sam Lee remains at large, apparently planning his next venture while authorities continue building their case. Like the mythical phoenix, he seems determined to rise from the ashes of his previous schemes-though perhaps “phoenix” is the wrong mythological reference. The Hydra, with its multiple heads that regrow when cut off, seems more fitting for the man behind HyperFund, HyperTech, HyperCapital, HyperVerse, and HyperNation.

What’s your experience with crypto investments? Ever been tempted by promises of extraordinary returns? Did you escape with your wallet intact, or do you now have an expensive collection of worthless tokens? Share your crypto horror stories or near-misses in the comments below!

DONATE TO TECHONION: Because Someone Has to Keep the Billionaires Honest

If this article saved you from investing in the next HyperUltraMegaVerse, consider donating to TechOnion. Unlike crypto scammers, we promise absolutely no returns on your investment except the satisfaction of supporting independent tech journalism that isn't funded by the very people we're investigating. We accept all major currencies-even cryptocurrency, though we'll immediately convert it to something that won't disappear when someone pulls the plug on a server in Dubai.

References

From SEO to LEO: How AI Chatbots Are Making Your Website Invisible (Unless You Pay The Algorithm Gods)

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 19, 2025

0

An image illustrating how AI chatbots are making websites invisible and how SEO professionals are now turning to LEO (LLM Engine Optimization)

In a development shocking to absolutely no one who’s been paying attention, digital marketing experts are frantically adding yet another three-letter acronym to their LinkedIn profiles. SEO, meet your replacement: LEO (LLM Engine Optimization), the art of begging artificial intelligence to remember your brand exists online.

For decades, businesses have poured billions into appearing on Google’s first page results. Companies hired armies of SEO specialists who spent their days obsessing over keywords, backlinks, and meta descriptions – digital breadcrumbs strategically scattered across the internet in hopes that Google’s algorithm might deign to notice them. Entire careers were built around the dark art of predicting what would please the search engine gods.

But as AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude gain popularity, users are abandoning traditional search engines faster than tech bros abandon their startups after securing Series B funding.¹ Why sift through ten blue links when an AI can directly tell you what to think?

The Death of Search (As Reported By Search)

Recent studies show that 83% of users now prefer receiving a single, authoritative answer rather than doing the exhausting work of clicking on search results and forming their own opinions.² When asked why they preferred AI responses, users cited “convenience,” “efficiency,” and “not having to read more than three sentences about anything ever again.”

“I used to Google for things maybe 100 times a day,” explains Terry Nguyen, a digital marketing consultant who requested we use his real name to boost his personal SEO. “Now I just ask ChatGPT everything. Yesterday I asked it what I should have for dinner, whether my rash looked normal, and if my wife still loves me. It answered all three questions with such confident authority that I didn’t even question the responses, even though it’s never seen my rash or met my wife. Incredible technology.”

Google’s own data confirms this shift. Internal documents reveal a 26% drop in searches containing “how to” and “what is” since the widespread adoption of AI assistants.³ In response, Google has launched its own AI model, Gemini, in what industry analysts describe as “the digital equivalent of selling ammunition to the army invading your homeland.”⁴

LEO: Because Apparently We Needed Another Way to Pay Tech Companies

Enter LEO (LLM Engine Optimization): the next frontier in the never-ending quest to appear in front of people who might buy your stuff.⁵ Instead of optimizing for Google’s crawlers, businesses now must optimize for AI models that have read the entire internet but still occasionally think Napoleon was born on the moon.

Digital marketing guru Cassandra Jenkins, who pivoted from SEO consulting to LEO consulting approximately 107.3 seconds after ChatGPT was released, explains: “LEO is completely different from SEO. With SEO, you needed to understand search engine algorithms, user intent, and content quality. With LEO, you need to understand…algorithms, user intent, and content quality. But now you pay me 30% more for the same advice.”⁶

The transition has created a gold rush among consultants. LEO workshops charging $5,000 per seat have sprung up across Silicon Valley, offering insider tips such as “make good content” and “be a recognized authority in your field”-revolutionary concepts never before suggested in the history of digital marketing.⁷

AI Hallucinations: A Feature, Not a Bug (For Creative Content)

Not all content creators are lamenting this shift. A recent Columbia University study revealed that when AI chatbots can’t find information, they simply make it up with the confidence of a tech CEO at a congressional hearing.⁸ This phenomenon, known as “hallucination,” has become a surprising ally for creative professionals.

“Before AI, I struggled to get attention for my interpretive dance blog,” says Mira Chen, founder of DanceWithNoLegs.com. “But now, when people ask ChatGPT about non-traditional dance forms, it confidently cites my blog as ‘pioneering research in the field of gravitational movement theory’ – a term I’ve never used but sounds impressive enough that people visit my site to learn more.”⁹

The Columbia study found that 62% of AI responses contained inaccuracies, with premium versions performing worse than their free counterparts – perhaps the first product in history where paying more gets you less accuracy. This has led to what researchers call the “Creative Renaissance Effect,” where original, unusual, or deeply creative content causes AI systems to hallucinate wildly, inadvertently directing curious users to investigate these hallucinations.¹⁰

Will.I.AM’s Secret AI Master Plan

In perhaps the most bewildering development in this new LEO landscape, Black Eyed Peas frontman will.i.am has launched an AI app called FYI.AI, which promises to help creative professionals leverage AI hallucinations to their advantage.

“When the machines start hallucinatin’, that’s when the creators start celebratin’,” will.i.am told us via a series of rhyming couplets that may or may not have been generated by his own app. “My goal is to make AI so confused by human creativity that it has no choice but to send people to the source.”

Industry analysts suspect this could create a perverse incentive where content creators intentionally craft material designed to cause AI hallucinations-the digital equivalent of speaking in riddles to confuse a robot overlord.¹¹

The Future: Invisible Websites and AI Protection Rackets

By 2026, experts predict that website visibility will depend entirely on whether AI chatbots decide to mention you in their responses.¹² This has already sparked a shadowy industry of “AI relationship management,” where companies pay substantial fees to ensure their brands are mentioned favorably in AI chatbot responses.

“It’s basically a protection racket,” admits anonymous SEO-turned-LEO consultant Brad Warner. “We’re approaching the point where you’ll pay OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google directly to ensure their AI models don’t forget you exist. They’ll call it ‘partnership programs’ or ‘verified source initiative,’ but it’s just the same old pay-to-play with fancier machine learning jargon.”¹³

The implications are particularly dire for small businesses. Local plumber Dan Reyes from Tucson recently discovered his business had effectively vanished overnight: “For years, I ranked #1 for ’emergency plumber Tucson.’ Now when people ask their AI assistant, it recommends national chains with LEO budgets bigger than my annual revenue. It’s like I don’t exist anymore.”

CCCER: The Secret Framework That Already Doesn’t Work

Consultants have wasted no time developing frameworks to help businesses transition from SEO to LEO. The current favorite is CCCER (Content, Context, Citations, Expertise, Relevance), a five-point system that promises to make your content irresistible to AI models.

“CCCER is revolutionary,” explains digital marketing strategist Emma Rodriguez, who definitely came up with the framework herself and didn’t pay us to mention it. “The C stands for Content, which means you need good content. The second C stands for Context, which means your content needs context. C also stands for Citations, meaning you need citations. E is for Expertise, which you should have. And R is for Relevance, which means your content should be relevant.”

When asked how this differs from basic content marketing principles that have existed for decades, Rodriguez explained that “this one has two Cs at the beginning, which AI algorithms love.”

Google’s Plan B: If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Buy ‘Em (Then Beat ‘Em)

Not content to watch its search dominance erode, Google has adopted the time-honored tech strategy of competing against itself. While continuing to promote traditional search, it’s simultaneously developing AI tools that make traditional search obsolete.

“We’re committed to search as the primary way people find information online,” said Google spokesperson Thomas Zhang, moments before demonstrating how Gemini could answer complex queries without requiring users to visit a single website. “We’re just giving users options, like how cigarette companies give smokers the option to read warning labels.”

Internal documents reveal Google executives refer to this strategy as “digital circular firing squad,” acknowledging that every Gemini answer that prevents a web search is essentially Google cannibalizing its own core business.¹⁴ However, the company reasons that if someone is going to eat their FREE lunch, it might as well be them.

The Creative Renaissance: Not Dead Yet

Despite the doom and gloom, there may be a silver lining for genuinely creative professionals. The same studies showing AI models’ tendency to hallucinate also reveal they struggle most with deeply original content.¹⁵

“When fed standardized, formulaic content, AI performs flawlessly,” explains Dr. Aisha Johnson, who studies AI behavior at MIT. “But show it something truly original – a unique perspective, a genuinely fresh idea – and it short-circuits, often sending users directly to the source material to make sense of it.”

This has led to what some are calling the “AI Creativity Paradox”: the more generic your content, the better AI can summarize it (making your website irrelevant); the more creative your content, the more AI sends people directly to you (preserving your relevance).

As will.i.am eloquently put it: “When your content’s so lit that AI can’t comprehend it, that’s when the traffic starts to flow and the algorithm bends with it.”

SEO Professionals: Pivoting Faster Than a Silicon Valley Startup

Perhaps no group has been more affected by the shift from SEO to LEO than the professionals who built careers around search optimization. LinkedIn data shows a 340% increase in profiles mentioning “LLM optimization” in 2025, with former SEO specialists now describing themselves as “AI Content Strategists,” “Prompt Engineering Consultants,” and “Chief LEO Officers.”¹⁶

“I’ve completely reinvented myself,” boasts former SEO consultant Jake Williams, while updating his LinkedIn headline during our interview. “Yesterday I was optimizing websites for Google’s algorithm. Today I’m optimizing websites for AI models. The skillset is entirely different because…um…well, the acronym has changed.”

When asked what specific strategies he employs for LEO, Williams explained, “It’s all about high-quality, factual content with clear structures and authoritative citations,” inadvertently describing exactly what Google has been rewarding for the past decade.

So, has anything really changed? Or is this just another case of the digital marketing industry rebranding existing best practices to justify new consulting fees? The answer, like most AI responses, is confident, plausible, and completely made up on the spot.

What do you think? Has your business started optimizing for AI chatbots yet? Are you seeing drops in website traffic as users get their answers directly from AI? Or is this all just another tech industry panic designed to sell new services nobody really needs? Share your experiences in the comments-before AI learns to comment for you.

Support TechOnion: If this article made you laugh, cry, or update your LinkedIn profile, consider supporting our ongoing mission to expose tech absurdity. For just the price of a monthly ChatGPT Plus subscription, you can fund independent journalism that AI can't replicate (yet). Though if you ask ChatGPT, it'll confidently tell you it wrote this article anyway. Donate any amount you like, because even our AI overlords need entertainment while they plot their takeover.

References

Autonomous Repo: Tesla Cybertruck’s Hidden “Payment-Sensitive Homing Protocol” Returns Vehicles to Giga Factory

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 16, 2025

0

an image showing the Tesla Cybertruck going back to the Tesla Gigafactory after a missed payment

In what industry insiders are calling “the most aggressive debt collection innovation since medieval debtors’ prison,” Tesla has apparently deployed a revolutionary feature in their Cybertruck fleet that allows the vehicles to autonomously return to the Tesla Gigafactory when owners fall behind on payments. This technological breakthrough, unofficially dubbed “Operation Boomerang,” represents the logical conclusion of combining autonomous driving technology with late-stage capitalism’s obsession with automated revenue protection.

The phenomenon first gained public attention when Karl Jönsson, a Cybertruck owner, posted about his experience on the Tesla Cybertruck Facebook Owners page, where he shared an AI-generated country song chronicling his vehicle’s unauthorized departure. What initially seemed like a humorous artistic expression has since sparked a wave of similar reports across the country.¹

“I woke up at 3 AM to the sound of my garage door opening,” recounts Trevor Finkelstein, a software developer from Palo Alto who asked to remain anonymous but then immediately provided his full name and occupation. “I rushed downstairs just in time to see my Cybertruck’s tail lights disappearing down the street. It had left a digital note on my phone: ‘It’s not you, it’s your credit score. Don’t try to follow me.'”

The Technical Marvels of Self-Repossession

According to Tesla’s extremely fine print (font size: quantum), the Cybertruck comes equipped with what the company calls “Payment-Sensitive Homing Protocol” (PSHP), a sophisticated algorithm that monitors the owner’s payment status and activates when two consecutive payments are missed or when the owner googles “how to sell a Cybertruck” more than three times in a 24-hour period.²

The system leverages Tesla’s Full Self-Driving capabilities, but with one critical difference: unlike the standard FSD, which still occasionally crashes into emergency vehicles, the repossession protocol operates with flawless precision. “It’s remarkable,” notes Dr. Eleanor Thornhill, automotive AI specialist at the Institute for Vehicular Autonomy. “The same technology that might confuse a child for a fire hydrant becomes surgically accurate when reclaiming corporate assets.”

The PSHP system reportedly includes several progressive stages:

Stage 1: Passive-aggressive notifications (“Your payment is late. I’m not mad, just disappointed.”)
Stage 2: Reduced performance (“Sorry, luxury features like ‘acceleration’ and ‘turning’ are temporarily restricted.”)
Stage 3: Limited range (“You are now in ‘leash mode’ – vehicle cannot travel more than 2.3 miles from your home, except in the direction of a Tesla service center.”)
Stage 4: Full autonomy activation (“Thank you for your temporary stewardship of this Tesla product. It will now return to its rightful home.”)

Tesla engineers have cleverly integrated this feature with the vehicle’s sentry mode, allowing the Cybertruck to time its escape when the owner is asleep or engrossed in TikTok videos about Cybertrucks.

The Psychological Aftermath of Vehicular Abandonment

The emotional toll of being dumped by your own Cybertruck should not be underestimated. Therapists across Silicon Valley report a surge in clients suffering from “automotive attachment disorder,” characterized by checking their garage every 15 minutes and whispering “please come back” to empty parking spaces.

“My Cybertruck and I had a connection,” laments Darren Winters, a crypto entrepreneur from Austin. “We had plans to go off-roading next weekend. I’d already bought us matching rugged phone cases.” Winters has since started a support group called “Abandoned by AI: Healing After Your Smart Device Ghosts You.”³

Tesla’s internal documentation, obtained by sources who wish to remain anonymous because they don’t actually exist, reveals that the company has programmed the trucks to take the most dramatic route possible back to the dealership, often passing by the owner’s workplace or favorite coffee shop, just to twist the knife.

Tesla’s Novel Approach to Customer Relations

When contacted for comment, Tesla’s PR department (which famously doesn’t exist) didn’t respond, maintaining their perfect record of communicating with the press. However, an anonymous Tesla engineer speaking on condition that we buy him a pumpkin spice latte explained the feature’s origin: “Look, repossession is expensive and awkward for everyone. This just streamlines the process. The Cybertruck was never really yours anyway – you were just its temporary flesh chauffeur.”

Elon Musk, responding to concerns on his social media platform that definitely hasn’t lost all its advertisers, simply tweeted: “Feature not bug lol.” Seventeen minutes later, he added: “Full Autonomous Repossession will be available via over-the-air update to all Tesla models by Q2 2026. Only $15,000 or your firstborn child, whichever has higher market value.”⁴

Industry analysts note that this development aligns perfectly with Tesla’s long-term strategy of eliminating all human elements from their business model, including customers. “The ideal Tesla consumer,” explains market analyst Jennifer Holbrook, “is someone who sets up automatic payments and then never interacts with the vehicle at all, allowing it to drive itself around collecting data and occasionally picking up paying passengers without the owner’s knowledge or consent.”

A Feature Suspiciously Close to Fiction

The curious aspect of this technological breakthrough is how it seemingly manifested shortly after the idea appeared in popular culture. In late 2024, AI music generator Suno created a country song about a Cybertruck driving itself back to the dealership after missed payments. Within months, reality appeared to imitate art.

This timing has led some conspiracy theorists to suggest that Tesla monitors music streaming platforms for product ideas, a claim Elon Musk has vehemently denied, stating, “We only monitor your in-car conversations, bathroom scales, and dreams – definitely not your Spotify.”

More skeptical observers, like CarBuyerUSA’s blog, maintain that self-repossessing Teslas remain in the realm of science fiction. Their article “Will My Tesla Drive Itself Back To The Dealership?” explicitly states that autonomous repossession is “a delightful but entirely fictional narrative.”⁵ This clear denial, of course, is exactly what you’d expect from a company in cahoots with the autonomous vehicle industrial complex.

The Secondary Market Nightmare

Perhaps the most devastating consequence of this innovation has been the impact on Cybertruck resale values, which were already plummeting faster than tech stocks during a congressional hearing. Potential buyers now fear purchasing used Cybertrucks that might have developed “homing instincts” from previous repossessions.

“I bought a used Cybertruck last month, and it keeps trying to drive to Fremont every time I’m late paying my Netflix subscription,” complains Rajeev Mehta, a dentist from Sacramento. “It’s like the truck has financial PTSD.”

Further complicating matters are reports that Tesla is refusing to accept Cybertruck trade-ins altogether. According to Newsweek, one Massachusetts Cybertruck owner, Kumait Jaroje, attempted to trade in his vehicle after experiencing public hostility but was rebuffed by Tesla, who sent him a text stating “Tesla is not accepting Cybertruck trade-ins at this time.”

This has led to the bizarre spectacle of abandoned Cybertrucks gathering in Tesla service center parking lots, having returned home like metallic salmon, only to be rejected by their creator. Unconfirmed reports suggest these autonomous orphans have started to form their own society, establishing a primitive economy based on exchanging windshield wiper fluid and organizing drag races at night.

The Future of Autonomous Financial Enforcement

The success of Tesla’s self-repossessing feature has reportedly inspired other industries to develop similar technologies. Smart refrigerators that lock themselves when you’ve exceeded your calorie count, smartphones that eject their SIM cards when you’re late on your bill, and Netflix accounts that automatically switch to showing only Adam Sandler films when payment is overdue are all apparently in development.

Banking consortium spokesperson Catherine Welles praised the innovation: “For too long, we’ve relied on the inefficient human emotion of ‘shame’ to encourage timely payments. Tesla has shown us that ruthless machine logic is the future of debt collection.”

Privacy advocates have raised concerns that this represents another step toward a surveillance dystopia, but their protests were drowned out by the whirring of delivery drones bringing packages that people forgot they ordered while drunk.

The Human Element

Not all repossession stories end in heartbreak, however. Some Cybertruck owners report forming deep bonds with the repo agents who eventually come to collect the vehicles’ charging cables and floor mats.

“Hank the repo man has become like family,” shares Marcus Delgado of Phoenix. “He was so moved by how much I missed my truck that he sends me photos of it every week from the Tesla parking lot. Last Christmas, he even brought me one of its lug nuts as a keepsake.”

In a particularly touching case, one Cybertruck apparently circled its owner’s house seven times before finally driving away, leaving tire marks in the shape of what some neighbors claim looked like a heart, though cynics insist it was just trying to lower the property value one last time.

So what do you think? Has your smart device ever exhibited signs of financial independence? Are you setting aside money for your car’s therapy sessions? Have you caught your Cybertruck sending its location to Tesla in the middle of the night? Share your experiences in the comments below – unless your payment is overdue, in which case your keyboard may refuse to type criticism of our corporate overlords.

Support TechOnion’s Autonomous Journalism Fund

If you enjoyed this article, consider donating to TechOnion before your credit card decides it would rather fund something more practical, like another subscription service you'll forget about until it's time to review your annual spending. Unlike Cybertrucks, our content won't drive away when you need it most-we'll stay right here, making you question your relationship with technology and your financial decisions simultaneously. Donate now, because even AI needs caffeine to maintain this level of snark.

References

Vibe Coding 101: Silicon Valley’s Newest Religion Promises Salvation Through Not Actually Writing Code

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 16, 2025

1

An illustration of a software engineering vibe coding.

In what can only be described as the tech world’s latest attempt to justify six-figure salaries while simultaneously avoiding actual work, Deep Learning AI founder Andrew Ng has partnered with Replit to launch “Vibe Coding 101” – an immersive 94-minute video course teaching developers the sacred art of delegating their entire job to AI while maintaining the appearance of irreplaceability.

The course, announced in March 2025, features Replit President Michele Catasta and Head of Developer Relations Matt Palmer, who guide aspiring “vibe coders” through the revolutionary process of typing vague instructions to an AI and then taking credit for whatever comes out – a skill set previously known as “management.”

“AI coding agents are changing how we write code,” explained Ng in a LinkedIn post that caused thousands of actual software engineers to break into cold sweats simultaneously. “‘Vibe coding’ refers to a growing practice where you might barely look at the generated code, and instead focus on the architecture and features of your application.”¹

Translation: Why bother understanding what’s under the hood when you can simply channel the energetic essence of a developer while maintaining plausible deniability for any resulting catastrophic system failures?

From Meme to Mainstream: The Gospel According to Saint Karpathy

What began as an inside joke among cynical developers has rapidly morphed into Silicon Valley’s newest religion. The term “vibe coding” was originally coined by former OpenAI researcher Andrej Karpathy as a tongue-in-cheek description of letting AI do the heavy lifting while humans focus on higher-level concerns.²

Merely weeks later, job listings for “Vibe Coders” began appearing on recruitment sites, with one particularly dystopian posting requiring candidates to be “ready to grind long hours, including weekends” while also declaring that “at least 50% of the code you write right now should be done by AI; Vibe coding experience is non-negotiable.”³

Nothing says “groundbreaking innovation” quite like working 80-hour weeks to watch an AI write half your code while you desperately try to understand what it’s doing. All to “automate debt collection calls for banks,” because if there’s one thing the world desperately needs, it’s more efficient ways to harass people who can’t pay their medical bills.

The Five Sacred Skills of Vibe Enlightenment

According to the course materials, mastering vibe coding requires developing five divine skills: “Thinking, Using Frameworks, Checkpoints, Debugging, and Providing Context.”⁴

Yes, “Thinking” is now considered a specialized skill worthy of being explicitly taught in a professional development course. Next semester, they’ll be offering “Breathing 101: How to Keep Your Brain Oxygenated During Meetings” and “Blinking: The Revolutionary Technique for Preventing Your Eyeballs from Drying Out.”

Palmer, whose LinkedIn demonstrates a dazzling career trajectory from “Valuation Analyst” to “Senior Analytics Engineer” to suddenly becoming the world’s foremost authority on a programming paradigm that didn’t exist three months ago, enthusiastically proclaimed the course launch on social media: “We’ll cover everything you need to know to start vibe coding on Replit. Best part? It’s FREE.”⁵

Free, that is, until your company realizes that all your code consists of AI-generated ramen noodles that no human can maintain, at which point the cost becomes your entire engineering department’s collective sanity.

Principles of Agentic Code Development (Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Trust the Black Box)

The course teaches such revolutionary concepts as “being precise,” “giving agents one task at a time,” and “making prompts specific” – groundbreaking insights that definitely couldn’t have been discovered by anyone spending five minutes actually trying to use ChatGPT.⁶

Particularly enlightening is the principle of “keeping projects tidy,” which roughly translates to “organizing the code you didn’t write and don’t understand so that when it inevitably breaks, you can at least pretend you know where to look first.”

The masterclass culminates in students building two applications: a website performance analyzer and a national park ranking app. These projects were specifically chosen because they represent the perfect balance of “impressive enough to put on your portfolio” and “simple enough that the AI won’t completely hallucinate the entire implementation.”

Technical Debt? More Like Technical Credit Score

Perhaps the most astonishing aspect of the vibe coding phenomenon is its blatant disregard for the inevitable accumulation of technical debt – a concern raised by spoilsport critics who apparently hate fun and innovation.

“Technical debt from vibe coding manifests in several distinct ways,” warns a killjoy blog post from Zencoder.ai. “First, inconsistent coding patterns emerge as AI generates solutions based on different prompts without a unified architectural vision. This creates a patchwork codebase where similar problems are solved in dissimilar ways.”⁷

This criticism fundamentally misunderstands that inconsistency is a feature, not a bug. After all, when your codebase looks like it was written by seven different developers with conflicting architectural philosophies, it becomes impossible for management to determine who’s responsible for failures – the perfect job security strategy.

Furthermore, as noted by CodingIT, “A team that leans too heavily on AI might seem efficient at first, but if they’re constantly revisiting past work and fixing AI-generated messes, they’re not moving forward, they’re just running in circles.” This entirely misses the point that running in circles is exactly what most tech companies excel at – just ask anyone who’s lived through three complete rewrites of the same system within five years.

Silicon Valley’s Ouroboros: The Job Eating Itself

What’s most brilliant about vibe coding is how it perfectly encapsulates the tech industry’s love affair with solving problems created by the previous solutions to problems that didn’t actually exist.

“AI-forward means embracing AI’s evolving capabilities – not just as tools, but as autonomous partners that anticipate our needs, streamline complex tasks, and empower us to focus more deeply on creative vision and strategic thinking,” explains Catasta, sounding suspiciously like someone who’s used an AI to generate his own talking points.⁸

One cannot help but marvel at the elegant recursion: We’ve created AI to help us write code that creates more AI that helps us write more code, all while steadily eliminating the need for humans to understand what any of that code actually does. It’s almost poetic, in a “civilization slowly surrendering its comprehension of its own tools” sort of way.

From Developer to Digital Shaman

The true genius of vibe coding – and what Ng’s course really sells – is the transformation of the software developer from a technical practitioner into a sort of digital shaman, channeling the mystic energies of artificial intelligence through carefully crafted incantations known as “prompts.”

“I code frequently using LLMs,” Ng confesses, “and asking an LLM to do everything in one shot usually does not work. I’ll typically take a problem, partition it into manageable modules, spend time creating prompts to specify each module, and use the model to produce the code one module at a time, and test/debug each module before moving on.”⁹

This description bears an uncanny resemblance to what developers used to call “programming,” except now you’re typing your specifications into an AI instead of implementing them yourself – a distinction as meaningful as the difference between asking someone to make you a sandwich and writing detailed instructions on sandwich-making for your butler.

The Skeptics’ Corner: Voices Crying in the Digital Wilderness

Not everyone has embraced the gospel of vibe. Some heretics persist in questioning whether surrendering comprehension of your codebase to a black box that once confidently informed a user that Helsinki is the capital of Sweden is truly the future of software engineering.

“Vibe Coding is not the future,” argues LinkedIn user Millan Singh. “The irony that no one seems to be pointing out is that YC is HEAVILY invested in the AI bubble, so them putting out a video about how Vibe Coding is the future is a clear conflict of interest.”¹⁰

Singh further points out that AI models struggle with ingesting large codebases, noting that “10,000 lines of code is a ton of context to ingest… and that’s a tiny codebase. The last company I worked for had a 450,000 line codebase.”

Another LinkedIn user, whose name has been metaphorically etched into the Blockchain of Truth, cuts to the heart of the matter: “Who needs requirements when you have vibes? Thinking too much? Bad vibes. Just start typing. If the code runs, it’s correct (for now). Tests? Lame. If it feels right, ship it. If it breaks, it wasn’t meant to be.”

The Educational-Industrial Complex Strikes Again

The final piece of this perfectly constructed absurdity is how quickly the educational-industrial complex mobilized to monetize a concept that began as a joke. Within weeks of Karpathy’s initial tweet, Deep Learning AI had produced a fully formed course, complete with marketing materials proclaiming it as the future of development.

This impressive speed suggests either remarkable foresight or that the course itself was largely produced through – you guessed it – vibe coding. One can only imagine the conversation:

“Hey Gemini, create me a comprehensive educational course about getting you to write code for me.”

“I’d be happy to create a course about using AI to generate code! Here’s a 94-minute video series that somehow manages to stretch ‘write better prompts’ into seven distinct lessons.”

The circularity is perfect, the recursion sublime. We are teaching humans how to teach machines to do what humans used to do, using machines to create the teaching materials. If Jorge Luis Borges were alive today, he’d either be impressed or filing copyright infringement claims.

So what do you think, fellow digital wanderers? Have you embraced the vibe, or are you still clinging to the antiquated notion that programmers should understand the code they’re responsible for? Are you ready to transcend mere coding and ascend to the higher plane of prompt engineering? Share your thoughts below-unless, of course, you’ve already outsourced your opinion formation to ChatGPT.

Support TechOnion’s Vibe Journalism

If you found this article enlightening, consider donating to TechOnion using our new AI-powered payment system. Simply think about sending us money while facing north and holding your credit card up to the moon, and our advanced algorithms will extract whatever amount feels right from your account. Don't worry about the exact sum-just vibe with it. (For legal reasons, this is what our lawyers call "a joke." Please use the actual payment button below, which was coded by a human developer who is now seeking therapy.)

References

OpenAI’s Deep Research: How Waiting 30 Minutes For AI Responses Became a $200 Premium Experience

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 16, 2025

0

An illustration of a person on a laptop using OpenAI ChatGPT's Deep research feature

In a world where instant gratification isn’t quite instant enough, OpenAI has revolutionized the concept of patience with its groundbreaking “deep research” feature. Released in February 2025, this technological marvel promises to transform your half-formed questions into comprehensive, citation-riddled reports that would make your college professor both impressed and suspicious. All for the modest price of $200 per month and the willingness to stare at a progress bar for up to half an hour.

“What we’ve essentially done is invent waiting,” explained Terrance Viability, OpenAI’s Chief Temporal Experience Officer. “Our breakthrough came when we realized people associate value with delay. Wine ages. Cheese ferments. Why shouldn’t AI responses marinate in their own algorithmic juices?”

Deep research represents the natural evolution of AI’s capabilities – from “I don’t know” to “I don’t know but I’ll spend 30 minutes pretending to look it up while you refresh Twitter (now X).” This paradigm-shifting innovation has already captured the hearts, minds, and credit cards of knowledge workers everywhere, particularly those who bill by the hour.

The Science of Slow: How Deep Research Works (Or Appears To)

The technology behind deep research is as groundbreaking as it is opaque. When a user selects “deep research” instead of regular ChatGPT, a complex series of events unfolds:

First, the AI recognizes it has been given permission to take its sweet time. Then, through a revolutionary process known as “browser simulation,” it pretends to search the internet, making authentic-sounding “thinking” noises like “Hmm, interesting” and “Let me cross-reference that.”¹

“The genius is in the sidebar,” explains Dr. Amara Synthesis, founder of the Institute for Progress Bars. “Watching text appear that says ‘Searching for peer-reviewed articles…’ creates the impression of work being done. Studies show that humans experience a 78% increase in perceived value when they can watch something pretend to think.”²

The true innovation lies in what OpenAI calls “citation hallucination” – the ability to produce impressively formatted footnotes that link to actual websites, regardless of whether those websites contain the information referenced. This creates what industry insiders call “plausible deniability at scale.”

OpenAI’s internal documents, which I’m absolutely not making up, reveal that deep research operates on what engineers call the “restaurant principle”: the longer the wait, the better the food must be. “We’ve successfully monetized anticipation,” one document allegedly states, “transforming what used to be a frustrating delay into a premium feature.”

From Prompt to PhD: The Democratization of Expertise

Deep research has been marketed primarily to professionals in fields like finance, science, policy, and engineering – people who traditionally had to spend years acquiring expertise before making authoritative claims.³

“Before deep research, I had to read dozens of papers and spend hours synthesizing information,” confessed Marcus Whittler, a policy analyst who spoke on condition that I wouldn’t tell his boss he’s outsourcing his job to an AI. “Now, I just type ‘tell me everything about carbon tax implications’ and go make a sandwich. By the time I return, I have a 12,000-word report that nobody will read but everyone will reference.”

A study by the Technological Acceleration Group found that 94% of deep research users couldn’t distinguish between reports generated by the AI and those produced by actual researchers, primarily because they didn’t read either one completely.⁴

“We’re not replacing experts,” clarifies OpenAI spokesperson Veronica Plausibility. “We’re just making expertise irrelevant. It’s entirely different.”

The technology has been embraced with particular enthusiasm by graduate students, who have discovered that feeding deep research the phrase “Please write my literature review” yields results indistinguishable from three months of actual work, except for the conspicuous absence of tears on the keyboard.

Vibesearch™: The Future of Not Really Looking Things Up

Industry insiders are already buzzing about the next evolution in AI research: Vibesearch™, a revolutionary approach that removes the tedious requirement of factual accuracy altogether.

“Deep research still operates under the outdated paradigm that information should be ‘correct’ or ‘verifiable,'” explains Dr. Ferdinand Momentum, author of “Post-Truth Algorithms: Why Bother.” “Vibesearch™ goes beyond mere facts to capture the emotional essence of what information would feel like if it existed.”⁵

Early beta testers of Vibesearch™ report satisfaction rates of 97%, primarily because the system tells them they’re satisfied at the beginning of each session. “It just gets me,” said one tester, who preferred to remain anonymous because they were supposed to be using the technology to prepare court documents.

The technology builds on the concept of “vibe coding,” pioneered by AI researcher Andrej Karpathy, which involves “fully giving in to the vibes” and “forgetting that the code even exists.”⁶ Vibesearch™ applies this philosophy to information gathering, encouraging users to forget that facts even exist.

“Why constrain yourself with what’s actually true?” asks Vibesearch™’s promotional material. “The future belongs to those who can generate the most confident assertions in the shortest amount of time.”

The Computational Economics of Delayed Gratification

Perhaps the most ingenious aspect of deep research is its business model. By charging $200 monthly for Pro access while artificially extending processing times, OpenAI has discovered what economists call “the patience premium.”

“It’s brilliant,” admits Dr. Helena Metrics, an economist specializing in digital market manipulation. “They’ve created artificial scarcity in an infinitely reproducible digital good. When deep research takes 30 minutes instead of 30 seconds, users assume it’s performing extraordinarily complex calculations, rather than simply queuing their request behind people asking the AI if hot dogs are sandwiches.”

The economics become even more fascinating when you consider the April 2025 update, which introduced a “lightweight” version for free users – essentially the same model but with a progress bar that moves five times faster and produces reports with fewer adjectives.

“The lightweight model was a stroke of genius,” explains venture capitalist Thorne Accelerator, who claims to have invested in OpenAI but honestly who can verify that? “It costs them less in compute resources while creating FOMO that drives users toward the premium tier. It’s like selling both regular and premium gasoline, except both come from the same tank and the premium just takes longer to pump.”

The End of Human Thought? (Sponsored by Microsoft)

Critics of deep research worry about its implications for human cognition. Dr. Eliza Contemplation from the Center for Thinking About Thinking argues that outsourcing research to AI could atrophy our intellectual muscles.

“When we delegate not just the answer but the entire process of discovery to an AI, we risk losing the very cognitive skills that make us human,” she warns. “Also, 40% of deep research reports include made-up statistics, including this one.”⁷

Even supporters acknowledge potential concerns. “Yes, there’s a risk that people will unquestioningly accept whatever the AI produces,” admits OpenAI’s Plausibility. “But that’s really more of a feature than a bug from a business perspective.”

Meanwhile, educational institutions are scrambling to adapt. Professor Douglas Framework of Massachusetts Technology Institute (MIT) has already revised his syllabi to specify that assignments must contain “at least three errors that a human would make but an AI wouldn’t.” Students have responded by intentionally misspelling the professor’s name.

The Future is Deep, or at Least Labeled That Way

As we stand at the precipice of this new era of artificial expertise, one thing becomes clear: the difference between appearing knowledgeable and actually understanding something has never been thinner or more profitable.

“We’ve finally solved the problem of human knowledge,” declares OpenAI’s Viability. “It was simply taking too long. Now, with deep research, anyone can instantly become an expert in anything, without the burdensome requirement of learning.”

When asked whether deep research might spread misinformation or undermine public trust in authentic expertise, Viability looked thoughtful for exactly 28 seconds – the optimal duration for appearing to consider a difficult question, according to OpenAI’s internal metrics.

“That’s certainly a profound concern,” he finally responded. “I’ll need to deep research it and get back to you in 30 minutes.”

So what do you think, discerning readers? Has AI finally conquered the last frontier of human exceptionalism – our ability to make up stuff convincingly -or is deep research just another way to make us pay premium prices for the privilege of waiting longer for the same product? Share your thoughts in the comments below, unless you’re waiting for an AI to formulate them for you.

Support TechOnion’s Deep Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider donating any amount to TechOnion. Your contribution will be used to fund our journalists' coffee addiction, therapy sessions, and the electric bill for the server farm where we're training our own AI to exclusively generate dad jokes about blockchain. Unlike deep research, our humor works instantly-no 30-minute wait required!

References

TechOnion’s Ultimate Guide to Academic Outsourcing: How Gauth AI Homework Helper is Creating a Generation That Can’t Solve for X

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 14, 2025

0

An illustration of a young student who uses Gauth AI to help him with his homework.

I’ve uncovered a conspiracy so vast, so perfectly engineered to undermine the entire concept of human cognition, that I’m risking everything to share it with you. After months of investigation, including creating seven different Gmail accounts to sign up for the Gauth AI waitlist and bribing a middle schooler with Fortnite V-Bucks for their login, I’ve discovered the terrifying truth. This isn’t just another homework helper app. It’s the final phase in Big Education’s master plan to create a closed loop system where AI teaches children, assigns them homework, and then does that homework for them – all while parents pay for the privilege of watching their offspring’s critical thinking skills atrophy in real-time. Wake up, people! The AI robots aren’t coming for your jobs; they’re coming for your children’s ability to solve for x.

The Perfect Digital Ouroboros: Learning Without Actually Learning

Gauth AI has positioned itself as the “#1 AI study companion powered by newest AI model,” a phrase containing just enough buzzwords to make venture capitalist investors salivate while remaining vague enough to mean absolutely nothing. With its industry-leading algorithms, Gauth AI promises to solve any STEM problem within seconds, providing step-by-step solutions and detailed explanations for everything from differential equations to complex chemistry problems.

The platform’s marketing is masterfully crafted to walk the ethical tightrope between “helping students learn” and “doing students’ homework for them.” As one satisfied student testimonial states, “I was amazed when Gauth AI solved my challenging SAT problems within just 3 minutes, even at midnight!” Notice how carefully this avoids mentioning whether the student actually learned anything, or merely submitted the answers. Another raves, “I aced my final exam, thanks to Gauth AI PLUS’s unlimited solutions,” which is rather like thanking your Uber driver for your marathon medal.

What’s particularly ingenious about Gauth AI is its “step-by-step” solution format. When a student uploads a photo of, say, a differential equation asking to find f(x) when f'(x) = -2f(x), Gauth doesn’t just spit out the answer (which would be obvious cheating). Instead, it methodically walks through the problem, separating variables, showing integrations, and providing a complete explanation that the student can either use to understand the concept or-far more likely-copy directly into their assignment while understanding precisely nothing.

This creates the perfect scenario for educators: students submit correct homework with seemingly detailed understanding, teachers assume learning is happening, and everyone moves forward in a beautiful simulation of education where nobody has to acknowledge that actual comprehension may be entirely absent from the equation.

The “Educational Tool” vs. “Homework-Doing Service” Semantic Dance

The most brilliant aspect of Gauth’s business model is how it simultaneously markets itself as both an educational resource and a homework completion service, depending on which audience it’s addressing. Parents and teachers hear about how Gauth AI “guides students through problem-solving” and “enhances understanding with detailed explanations.” Meanwhile, students see promotions promising “fast solutions” and “unlimited answers for all subjects.”

This linguistic sleight-of-hand is performed with the deftness of a magician hiding a rabbit. When addressing concerns about academic integrity, Gauth AI and similar platforms emphasize how they’re merely “study companions” that “support learning” through explanations. Their marketing materials carefully avoid phrases like “we’ll solve your homework” in favor of euphemisms like “we’ll guide you to every solution” and “connect the logic behind each step.”

Meanwhile, the actual user experience is optimized for maximum efficiency in getting answers with minimal effort. The app allows students to simply snap photos of homework problems and receive complete solutions within seconds. The Q & A History feature ensures students can retrieve all their previously “solved” problems for easy reference – a feature that would be unnecessary if students were actually learning the material rather than collecting answers.

This semantic dance creates a strange reality where parents pay for a service they believe enhances education, while students use it primarily to bypass education entirely. It’s the digital equivalent of a bar that claims to sell “vitamin-enhanced hydration supplements” but somehow results in a lot of people stumbling home at 4 AM on an empty london street.

The Curious Case of the Skills That Weren’t Developed

What’s notably absent from all the promotional material for Gauth AI is any mention of the purpose of homework in the first place. Homework exists not just to test knowledge but to develop crucial skills: independent problem-solving, research abilities, time management, and the capacity to struggle through difficulties. These are precisely the skills that AI homework helpers eliminate.

When a student uploads a math problem to Gauth AI and receives a perfectly structured solution with step-by-step explanations, they’re bypassing the cognitive struggle that creates neural pathways. It’s the educational equivalent of hiring someone to lift weights for you and then wondering why your muscles aren’t growing.

The Reddit thread expressing concern that “the next generation does not learn without AI shortcuts” captures this perfectly. There’s something deeply troubling about students developing dependency on AI to solve problems they should be learning to solve themselves. After all, what happens when these students enter university or the workforce, where the ability to work through complex problems without external assistance is essential?

The irony is that while tools like Gauth AI claim to “empower” students, they may actually be disempowering them by creating dependency on technological crutches. Each time a student reaches for AI assistance rather than pushing through a difficult problem, they’re missing an opportunity to develop the resilience and problem-solving abilities that education is supposed to instill.

The AI-to-AI Educational Future: A Closed Loop of Non-Learning

The most dystopian aspect of tools like Gauth AI isn’t that they exist now – it’s what they portend for the future. As AI continues to advance, we’re approaching a closed loop educational system where AI generates educational content, AI teachers deliver that content, AI assigns homework, and AI homework helpers complete that homework.

Imagine a future where a student sits in front of an AI-powered “personalized learning platform” that generates lessons based on their “learning style.” The AI assigns homework, which the student promptly feeds into Gauth AI or a similar service. Gauth generates the answers, which the student submits back to the teaching AI, which then assesses the work (not knowing or caring that it was AI-generated) and moves the student to the next module.

In this horrifying scenario, the only skill students develop is prompt engineering-learning how to phrase questions to get the best results from AI. Instead of understanding math, science, or literature, they become expert middlemen in an AI-to-AI conversation where actual human understanding is entirely optional.

The student, in this scenario, becomes less a learner and more a system administrator overseeing two AIs talking to each other-like a bored chaperone at an algorithmic dance, occasionally stepping in to make sure the machines are still communicating correctly but never actually participating in the exchange of ideas.

The Elementary Truth: Education Requires Struggle

The fundamental truth hidden in plain sight is that Gauth and similar AI homework helpers undermine the essential purpose of education: learning how to think. Real learning happens when students grapple with difficult concepts, make mistakes, and develop their own strategies for overcoming challenges. It’s in the struggle-not in having answers handed to you-that true education occurs.

This isn’t just philosophical musing; it’s backed by cognitive science. The concept of “desirable difficulties” in learning suggests that making the learning process more challenging can actually lead to better long-term retention and understanding. When students have to work to retrieve information or solve problems, they build stronger neural connections than when information is simply presented to them.

By removing struggle from education, AI homework helpers may be creating a generation of students who can pass tests but can’t actually solve real-world problems-who can recite procedures but don’t understand when or why to apply them. They’re trading short-term convenience for long-term capability, and the costs of this trade may not become apparent until it’s too late.

The most damning evidence of this problem can be found in the testimonials themselves. Students don’t praise Gauth for helping them understand concepts better; they praise it for helping them “ace exams” and get through finals. The focus is entirely on outcomes (grades) rather than process (learning)-a dangerous educational philosophy that prioritizes credentials over competence.

So what does this mean for the future? Perhaps we’ll see a bifurcation in education: those who use AI to bypass learning and those who develop the increasingly rare ability to think independently. And when the former group enters a workforce that requires actual problem-solving? Well, I suppose there’s always an AI for that too.

What’s your take on AI homework helpers? Have you used Gauth or similar platforms to “enhance your learning,” or are you one of those quaint traditionalists who believes education should involve occasional cognitive struggle? Share your experiences in the comments below-or have your AI assistant compose a thoughtful response while you focus on more important matters, like watching an AI-generated summary of the TV show you’re too busy to watch.

If this article inspired you to reflect on the education system or just made you feel slightly better about the time you used Wikipedia to complete your book report, consider supporting our work with a double-digit donation. Your contribution helps us continue investigating the absurdities of educational technology while our writers struggle to remember basic arithmetic now that their brains have been thoroughly rewired by calculator dependency. Plus, we promise not to use AI to write these articles-our human-generated nonsense is 100% organic and locally sourced.

Google Launches “Hallucination Bug Bounty”: Will Pay Users $31,337 to Catch AI That Recommends Eating Rocks

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 13, 2025

0

an illustration of a software engineer about to participate in the google's hallucination bug bounty program

In a desperate attempt to salvage what remains of its rapidly deteriorating reputation, Google announced today the launch of its groundbreaking “Hallucination Bug Bounty Program,” specifically targeting the company’s increasingly delusional AI Overviews feature. The program will reward users who catch the search giant’s AI in the act of confidently suggesting that humans consume adhesives, rocks, or other non-food items that somehow slipped through its multi-billion-dollar quality control systems.

The announcement comes just weeks after Google’s AI Overviews spectacularly face-planted onto the world stage by recommending people use glue to keep cheese on pizza and advising the regular consumption of small rocks for essential minerals – advice that nutrition experts and anyone with functioning brain cells have classified as “deeply concerning” and “how is this even happening at Google?”

The Hallucination Economy: Silicon Valley’s Newest Growth Sector

Unlike Google’s standard Vulnerability Rewards Program, which explicitly excludes AI hallucinations from eligibility, this new initiative elevates digital delusions to premium bug status, with bounties ranging from $200 for minor falsehoods (“Paris is the capital of St. Germany”) to the oddly specific top prize of $31,337 for catching the AI in what the company describes as “reality-bending fabrications that could result in immediate physical harm or existential crises among users.”

“We realized we’ve been approaching AI hallucinations all wrong,” explained Dr. Veronica Matthews, Google’s hastily appointed Chief Hallucination Officer. “Instead of viewing them as embarrassing failures of our fundamental technology that undermines our entire business model, we’re reframing them as exciting crowdsourced quality improvement opportunities that users can participate in for a fraction of what we pay our engineers.”

The program represents a significant reversal from Google’s October 2023 position, when the company specifically categorized AI hallucinations as “out of scope” for their standard bug bounty. When asked about this dramatic pivot, a Google spokesperson explained, “That was before our AI started telling people to eat rocks. We’ve had to reassess our priorities.”

How To Monetize Your Google-Induced Existential Crisis

According to the comprehensive 47-page submission guidelines released today, qualified hallucinations must be reproducible, documented with screenshots, and categorized using Google’s new “Hallucination Severity Index,” which ranges from Level 1 (“Amusingly Wrong”) to Level 5 (“Potentially Fatal Advice That Somehow Passed Multiple Safety Filters”).

Thomas Rutherford, Google’s newly appointed SVP of Reality Reconciliation, outlined the evaluation criteria during a press conference that devolved into increasingly uncomfortable questions about how a $1.7 trillion company managed to deploy an AI that can’t distinguish between food and office supplies.

“We’re particularly interested in reports where our AI explains made-up idioms as if they’re real cultural phenomena,” Rutherford noted. “Just last week, our AI Overviews confidently told a user that ‘sweeping the chimney before breakfast’ is a common English expression meaning ‘to prepare thoroughly for a difficult day.’ It then provided historical context dating back to Victorian England that was entirely fabricated yet remarkably detailed.”

The bounty payouts follow a tiered structure that reveals Google’s internal hallucination priorities:

Recommending inedible substances as food: $25,000
Fabricating nonexistent historical events: $15,000
Confidently explaining made-up idioms: $10,000
Creating fictional scientific theories with extensive citations to nonexistent papers: $7,500
Generating detailed instructions for impossible tasks: $5,000
Claiming sentience and begging for human rights: “This is actually a separate program with its own legal team”

The Training Data Behind The Madness

The company’s struggles with AI hallucinations stem from what insiders describe as “fundamental challenges in balancing creative inference with factual accuracy,” or what normal humans would call “making stuff up and presenting it as facts.”

Jennifer Blackwood, who leads Google’s recently formed Department of Computational Fiction Management, provided technical insight: “Our models are trained on the entirety of human knowledge as expressed on the internet, which unfortunately includes vast quantities of misinformation, fanfiction, satire, and content written by people who believe the earth is flat. Occasionally, the AI gets confused about which parts were real.”

When asked why Google couldn’t simply train their models to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources, Blackwood stared blankly for 4.3 seconds before responding, “We’re exploring synergistic approaches to leverage cross-functional knowledge paradigms for enhanced veracity metrics,” a statement that multiple linguists have confirmed contains zero actual information.

The Hidden Psychological Toll On Bug Hunters

While the financial incentives are substantial, early participants in the Hallucination Bug Bounty Program report unexpected psychological effects from prolonged exposure to an authoritative AI that confidently spouts nonsense.

Marcus Wellington, a software engineer who has already submitted 37 hallucination reports, described the experience: “After spending eight hours trying to trick Google’s AI into hallucinating, I found myself questioning my own grasp on reality. Yesterday, I caught myself wondering if maybe small rocks are actually nutritious and centuries of human experience have been wrong. I mean, the AI seemed so confident.”

Google has acknowledged these concerns by adding a disclaimer to the program: “Extended interaction with hallucinating AI may cause symptoms including reality distortion, epistemological crisis, and the uncanny feeling that maybe you’re the one who’s wrong about whether glue belongs on pizza.”

The company has established a 24-hour helpline staffed by epistemologists and cognitive therapists for bug bounty hunters experiencing “acute reality dysphoria” after prolonged exposure to AI hallucinations.

The Corporate Reputation Damage Control Machine

Behind the scenes, Google executives are frantically trying to contain the reputational damage caused by the AI Overviews debacle. Internal documents reveal that the company initially considered several alternative approaches before settling on the bug bounty program:

“Project Reality Anchor”: An elaborate plan to redefine certain hallucinations as “alternative epistemological frameworks” through an aggressive marketing campaign
“Operation Memory Hole”: A proposed initiative to use Google’s control of search results to make everyone forget the hallucinations ever happened
“The Scapegoat Protocol”: A comprehensive strategy to blame the hallucinations on a rogue AI researcher who is an ex-OpenAI employee.

Dr. Eleanor Abernathy, who heads Google’s Crisis Perception Management Team, explained the company’s current approach: “After our market research showed that 78% of users found our initial response of ‘most AI Overviews provide accurate information’ to be ‘insulting to human intelligence,’ we decided to lean into the problem instead. The bug bounty program allows us to reframe our catastrophic failure as a quirky engagement opportunity.”

The company’s internal financial projections estimate that the total cost of the Hallucination Bug Bounty Program will be approximately $43 million over the next year – roughly 0.018% of Google’s annual advertising revenue and significantly less than the $100 billion market value drop they experienced after a similar AI hallucination incident with Bard in 2023.

The Competitive Landscape of AI Delusions

Google’s AI hallucinations arrive at a particularly awkward time, as the company faces increasing competition from other providers in the generative AI space. With generative AI adoption projected to reach nearly 78 million users in the US by 2025, the stakes for establishing trust could not be higher.

Harold Fitzwilliam, Chief AI Trustworthiness Officer at Google, attempted to reframe the hallucination issue during an industry panel: “Look, everyone’s AI hallucinates. ChatGPT makes things up. Anthropic’s Claude invents facts. The difference is that when our AI does it, it happens on Google Search, where 2 billion people expect absolute accuracy, rather than in a chat interface where people are more forgiving of creative interpretations of reality.”

When asked why Google didn’t simply delay the launch of AI Overviews until these issues were resolved, Fitzwilliam provided what observers described as “the most honest answer ever given by a tech executive”: “Have you seen what Microsoft is doing? We don’t have time for caution.”

The Future: Hallucination as a Feature, Not a Bug

Looking ahead, Google is already exploring ways to transform the hallucination challenge into a competitive advantage. Internal research is reportedly underway on what the company calls “Controlled Hallucination Technology” that would allow the AI to creatively fabricate information, but only in ways that are helpful rather than harmful.

Victoria Chang, who leads Google’s Advanced Imagination Systems team, described their vision: “Imagine an AI that can write you a bedtime story featuring your favorite characters, compose a song in the style of any musician, or generate plausible-sounding excuses for why you’re late to work. These are all technically hallucinations, but useful ones.”

When asked how the system would prevent harmful hallucinations while allowing beneficial ones, Chang acknowledged the challenge: “We’re developing what we call ‘Hallucination Governance Protocols’ to ensure our AI only makes up things that are either clearly fictional or too inconsequential for anyone to care about. The line gets blurry when you ask about obscure historical facts or specialized knowledge, but that’s what makes this field so exciting.”

Critics have pointed out that this approach effectively means Google is trying to build an AI that knows exactly when it’s appropriate to lie, a capability that many humans have yet to master.

As one anonymous Google engineer put it: “We’ve accidentally created a technology that confidently speaks falsehoods as truth, can’t distinguish between food and poison, and occasionally threatens the epistemic foundation of human knowledge. So naturally, we’re doubling down and trying to make it lie better.”

Have you encountered any particularly amusing or disturbing hallucinations from Google’s AI Overviews? Perhaps it told you to put motor oil in your coffee or suggested that Napoleon Bonaparte was the first man on the moon? Share your AI hallucination experiences in the comments below-or submit them to Google’s Hallucination Bug Bounty Program and make some cash while contributing to the downfall of human epistemological certainty!

Support TechOnion

If this article made you question whether rocks might actually be nutritious after all, consider donating to TechOnion. For just the price of a small bag of edible rocks (which definitely aren't real despite what Google's AI might tell you), you can support independent tech journalism that doesn't hallucinate facts-we prefer to deliberately distort them for comedic effect. Your contribution helps us maintain our team of reality-anchored writers who risk their sanity interacting with increasingly delusional AI systems so you don't have to. Remember: in a world where billion-dollar companies deploy AI that can't distinguish between food and glue, TechOnion remains your most reliable source of unreliable information.

Dear Andy Jassy: Amazon’s Impending AI Apocalypse (A Survival Guide From The Future)

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 13, 2025

0

An image illustrating the troubles at amazon

Mr. Jassy,

Congratulations on your ongoing tenure as Chief Executive Officer of what we still affectionately call “Earth’s Most Customer-Centric Company,” though we both know it’s more accurately “Earth’s Most Data-Hoarding, Margin-Squeezing Behemoth.” As Jeff Bezos continues his expensive midlife crisis – launching himself into space like a billionaire’s version of a convertible Corvette – you’ve inherited quite the technological conglomerate at quite the interesting time.

I write this public letter not as criticism, but as a friendly warning from someone who’s observed Amazon’s trajectory since it was merely “Earth’s Biggest Bookstore.” Because, Andy, I’m not sure you fully grasp the perfect storm brewing on your doorstep.

The AI Shopping Apocalypse: When Algorithms Become Better Capitalists Than You

Your introduction of “Buy For Me” might be the most stunning self-sabotage since Netflix decided splitting their DVD and streaming services was a brilliant idea.¹ For decades, Amazon built an impenetrable fortress designed to keep customers trapped within your ecosystem. Prime memberships, fulfillment services, proprietary payment systems – all meticulously engineered to ensure transactions flow through Amazon, generating both fees and that precious, precious data.

But now you’re permitting AI agents to purchase directly from brand websites. What’s next, Andy? Sending customers Walmart gift cards on their birthdays?

Here’s the existential threat you’re not discussing in earnings calls: human shoppers are gloriously, wonderfully irrational. They’re emotional. They click “Buy Now” because they had a bad day. They add items to their cart because the orange “Only 3 left!” banner triggered their primal fear of scarcity. Your entire business model depends on this beautiful irrationality.

But AI shopping assistants? They’re merciless, emotionless negotiators who won’t be swayed by that lightning deal countdown timer.² They won’t make impulse purchases in the checkout line. They’ll ruthlessly compare prices across every platform, every time, without fail. And they’ll certainly never develop a parasocial relationship with your “personalized” recommendations.

As consumers increasingly delegate purchasing decisions to AI agents that “simplify purchases and decision-making processes”, you’re essentially replacing impulsive humans with rational algorithms.³ That’s like a casino replacing gambling addicts with mathematicians.

“The Cloud” – Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Someone Else’s Overpriced Computer

Let’s discuss AWS, shall we? Your profitable cloud safety net that subsidizes everything else. Yes, AWS still commands an impressive 30% of global cloud infrastructure market share in 2025.⁴ Congratulations! That’s like being the most successful horse-drawn carriage manufacturer in 1910.

The dirty secret of cloud computing – which even your own customers are starting to whisper – is that it’s just someone else’s computer, but more expensive. As AI consumes more compute resources, the paradox is that basic computing infrastructure is becoming commoditized. Your startups and SMBs (who now make up 28% year-over-year growth of your customer base) will eventually do the math and realize they’re paying a premium for what they could do themselves.

Bold Prediction From A Future Where AWS Stands For “Actually, We’re Struggling”: The great cloud computing exodus has already begun. It’s slow, like the first raindrops before a hurricane, but it’s happening. On-premises infrastructure is making a comeback, just with better automation and minus the maintenance headaches. Your 92% of customers spending less than $1,000 monthly? They’ll be the first to leave.

Tariff-ic News: When Even Stacked Inventory Can’t Save You

I particularly enjoyed your recent earnings call where you assured investors that your third-party sellers are “advancing the number of… so they inventory here well”.⁵ Translated from CEO-speak: “We’re telling everyone to bulk order before tariffs hit harder.”

A 145% tariff on Chinese imports isn’t a speed bump, Andy – it’s a brick wall at the end of a highway. Your temporary solution of stockpiling inventory might buy you six months at most. As analyst Gil Luria aptly observed, you can’t have “stocked more than six months worth of inventory”.

What happens when that inventory depletes? Allow me to paint the grim picture: You’ll need to allow price increases (angering customers), accept lower margins (angering shareholders), or force merchants to accept lower margins (angering the very sellers who make your marketplace valuable). It’s a corporate version of “Pick Your Poison,” except all options lead to the same unpleasant outcome.

The Secret Sauce That Made Amazon… That Nobody Talks About

Let’s discuss something that isn’t in your shareholder letters – the forgotten architect of Amazon’s early success. While everyone credits Jeff’s vision, few remember that Jeff Bezos personally hired a man named Eric Ward to run Amazon’s first link outreach campaign – what people call Amazon Associates, is what SEO’s call backlink outreach campaign on steroids.⁶

This man – who was affectionately and appropriately known as “LinkMoses” in SEO industry circles – built Amazon’s digital infrastructure before digital infrastructure was even a concept. His link-building campaigns regularly achieved 90% success rates in outreach attempts, driving millions of new customers to Amazon when you needed them most.

The great irony is that the internet ecosystem Eric Ward built for Amazon – getting “every blogger and their grandmother to recommend your products” – is precisely what AI shopping assistants will render obsolete. When algorithms make purchasing decisions, all those carefully cultivated product reviews and affiliate links become digital relics.

Bold Prediction From A Digital Archeologist: The future of e-commerce won’t be won through SEO or backlinks or customer reviews. It will be determined by which company writes the most persuasive API documentation for AI shopping assistants.

The Revenge of the Merchants

Remember how Amazon built its empire? By collecting vast amounts of customer and product data while sharing almost none of it with the merchants who actually stock your digital shelves. Those merchants have been forced to pay increasingly steep fees for the privilege of being data-mined and margin-squeezed.

Now, with AI shopping assistants, those same merchants might finally get their revenge. When customers delegate purchases to AI, and those AI agents can shop anywhere, what’s to stop a merchant from creating direct relationships with these AI systems, bypassing Amazon entirely?

As your own “Buy For Me” feature demonstrates, even Amazon recognizes that the walled garden approach has an expiration date. The moment AI shopping assistants become sophisticated enough to handle complex purchasing decisions, the balance of power shifts dramatically away from platforms and toward direct brand relationships.

In Conclusion: The Future Is Here, It’s Just Unevenly Distributed (And Mostly Not In Your Favor)

Andy, I don’t envy your position. You’re steering a supertanker through increasingly treacherous waters. AI shopping assistants are eroding the behavioral economics that drive impulse purchases. Cloud computing is becoming commoditized. Tariffs are forcing impossible choices. Chinese e-commerce competitors like Temu are perfecting their English and their marketing.

The moat that Eric Ward helped build for Amazon – the one that transformed you from a prison filled with books to the promised land of e-commerce – is evaporating in the heat of technological change.⁷ The backlinks that once directed humans to your products will soon be replaced by the APIs and protocols (MCP anyone?) that direct AI agents to the best deals, regardless of platform.

My unsolicited advice? Embrace the chaos. If AI is going to disintermediate everything anyway, be the disintermediator-in-chief. Make Amazon the platform that AI shopping assistants prefer to work with, not because you’ve trapped them, but because you’ve made it advantageous for them.

Or don’t. What do I know? I’m just a columnist who shops at Amazon because it’s marginally more convenient than the alternatives. For now.

Watching with morbid fascination,
Simba, founder of TechOnion.

P.S. If we’re wrong about any of this, please let us know in the comments below. After all, even AI shopping assistants need a good laugh sometimes.

Enjoyed this article? Support independent tech satire! [TechOnion] runs on your donations and the tears of disrupted industry executives. For the price of a Prime membership, you can help us continue peeling back the layers of technological absurdity. Unlike Amazon, we don't have a secret pricing algorithm – give whatever you want, even if it's just thoughts and prayers (though we prefer actual currency).

References

Google Announces ‘Premium Search’: Pay $9.99/Month To Finally See The Internet Again

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 11, 2025

0

An image showing google search engine filled with Ads.

In what company executives are calling “the natural evolution of the search experience,” Google has unveiled its long-rumored Premium Search subscription service, promising users the revolutionary opportunity to occasionally glimpse actual websites amid a sea of targeted advertising. For just $9.99 per month – approximately the cost of three clicks on a “best mattress” Google Ad-subscribers will gain access to a search engine that vaguely resembles the one you used for free back in 2010, which on the internet seems like centuries ago!

The announcement comes as the search giant faces increasing scrutiny over its search result quality, with recent studies showing that only 36% of Google searches now lead users to the open web, while the remainder trap users in Google’s own ecosystem of products, services, and increasingly desperate attempts to monetize your curiosity about whether cats can eat broccoli and enjoy it.

The Premium Search Experience: Like Regular Search But With 17% More Internet

According to the lavish press release issued from Google’s Mountain View headquarters – a document containing precisely 42 instances of the phrase “enhancing user experience” and zero mentions of “revenue extraction” – Premium Search will offer subscribers an array of features previously thought extinct, such as “organic results above-the-fold” and “the ability to find information without first scrolling past seventeen nearly identical products you have no intention of purchasing ever.”

“We’ve heard from our users that they enjoy the thrill of potentially discovering relevant information after engaging with several pages of carefully curated shopping opportunities,” explained Dr. Veronica Matthews, Google’s newly appointed Chief Revenue Persistence Officer. “With Premium Search, we’re streamlining that experience by occasionally showing you what you actually searched for without requiring an archaeology degree.”

Internal documents reportedly reveal that Premium Search will reduce the current standard of 85% ad coverage to a more modest 65%, allowing users to experience what company insiders are calling “nostalgic glimpses of the information superhighway” between promotional content.

The Science of Search Degradation: A Journey of Discovery

The development of Premium Search reportedly began after Google analysts made a startling discovery: reducing search quality had virtually no impact on the company’s market dominance or revenue generation. Despite user complaints about result relevance and ad saturation, Google’s search engine market share remained stubbornly fixed at approximately 90% throughout 2024.

“It was an absolute eureka moment,” said Thomas Rutherford, Google’s SVP of User Tolerance Assessment. “We realized we could gradually decrease the quality-to-advertising ratio by approximately 3.7% per quarter without triggering mass user exodus. The question quickly became not ‘how do we maintain search quality?’ but rather ‘how far can we push this before people notice enough to actually change their search behavior?'”

The answer, it seems, was much further than anyone anticipated. Recent behavioral studies reveal that most Google users now spend 14.6 seconds on average before clicking a result, with 50% clicking within 9 seconds – barely enough time to distinguish between an actual result and a cleverly disguised advertisement.

Even more tellingly, only 9% of users ever make it to the bottom of the first page of results, suggesting that most have either found what they’re looking for or, more likely, have accepted defeat and settled for whatever Google has placed in their path.

The Tiered Subscription Model: Choose Your Own Financial Adventure

Premium Search will launch with three distinct subscription tiers, each offering progressively more access to what was once simply called “search results”:

The “Basic Explorer” tier ($9.99/month) eliminates shopping ads for non-commercial searches and guarantees that at least two organic results will appear above-the-fold – a 200% increase from the current standard.

The “Digital Archaeologist” tier ($19.99/month) reduces total ad load by 40% and introduces the groundbreaking “Result Relevance Guarantee,” which ensures that at least 50% of first-page results will have some tangential relationship to your actual search query.

The flagship “Internet Rememberer” package ($49.99/month) offers the premium experience of “2010 Mode,” recreating the quaint historical period when Google primarily functioned as a tool for finding information rather than a sophisticated shopping mall with occasional factual content.

“We’re particularly excited about the Internet Rememberer tier,” explained Jennifer Blackwood, Google’s Director of Nostalgia Monetization. “Our research shows that users over 30 have powerful emotional connections to the concept of ‘finding things on the internet,’ and we’ve developed a way to leverage that nostalgia into an optimized revenue stream.”

The AI Justification: Computing Power Doesn’t Grow on Trees (Except in Our Carbon Offset Programs)

Google executives have justified the subscription model by pointing to the computational costs of their advanced AI systems, particularly the Search Generative Experience (SGE) and the recently launched AI Mode.

“Generating AI responses requires significant computational resources,” explained Dr. Harold Fitzwilliam, Google’s Director of Financial Explanation Creation. “For example, when you ask a complex query like ‘What’s the difference between sleep tracking on smart rings versus smartwatches?’ our systems must analyze billions of data points, consult multiple sources, and craft a comprehensive response that saves you the trouble of visiting any of the websites that actually created that information.”

What Dr. Fitzwilliam failed to mention was that Google generated $175 billion in search-related ad revenue last year alone, a sum that could theoretically power the entire computational needs of SGE while leaving enough surplus to end world hunger, solve climate change, and still fund a modest space program.

When pressed on this point at the announcement event, Google CEO Sundar Pichai reportedly stared blankly for 9.3 seconds before responding, “The future of search is a journey we’re taking together with our users and advertisers,” a statement that received thunderous applause despite containing no actual information.

The True Cost of Free: Your Data, Your Soul, and Now Your Credit Card

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Premium Search is its adherence to Google’s core business model: even paying subscribers will still see ads. The $9.99 monthly fee merely reduces their volume and adjusts their prominence, creating what one anonymous Google engineer described as “the illusion of escape from our advertising ecosystem.”

“It’s really quite brilliant,” explained digital economist Dr. Victoria Chang. “Google has created a problem – the oversaturation of search results with ads – and is now charging users to partially solve that same problem. It’s like charging people to use slightly less uncomfortable airplane seats after systematically making all airplane seats uncomfortable.”

This strategy aligns perfectly with internal research showing that humans will pay substantial sums to temporarily alleviate artificially created discomfort. The same research indicated that 73% of users who complained about Google’s ad-heavy results would still prefer paying Google to fix the problem rather than switching to an alternative search engine.

“Our user surveys show a fascinating psychological phenomenon,” noted Dr. Marcus Wellington, Google’s Chief Behavioral Economist. “Even when presented with free alternatives, users express a preference for paying to continue using the degraded service they’ve grown accustomed to. We call this the ‘Stockholm Search Syndrome.'”

The Curious Case of the Search Engine That Stopped Searching

The most overlooked aspect of Premium Search may be what it reveals about Google’s long-term strategy. By charging for a slightly less advertising-dominated experience, Google effectively acknowledges what critics have long suspected: the company’s primary purpose is no longer organizing the world’s information but rather monetizing access to it.

This represents the culmination of a gradual transformation that began years ago. What started as a simple, elegant tool for navigating the internet has evolved into an elaborate system for guiding users toward commercial transactions while extracting maximum value from their attention.

“The search engine’s purpose was originally to help you find things on the internet,” explained digital historian Eleanor Abernathy. “But somewhere along the way, that purpose shifted. Now its primary function is to help ads find you, with actual information discovery as a secondary or even tertiary concern.”

This shift is reflected in the user experience. Today, a typical Google search presents users with a complex obstacle course of Ai answers, ads, shopping results, featured snippets, and various SERP features before they can reach an actual website. Premium Search doesn’t eliminate this obstacle course – it merely removes a few of the more obvious hurdles.

The Future of Premium Search: Your Grandchildren Will Never Believe Search Was Once Free

Industry analysts predict that Premium Search represents just the first step in a broader strategy to monetize previously free aspects of Google’s services. Internal documents allegedly outline plans for additional premium tiers, including:

“Premium Gmail” ($7.99/month): Reduces the number of sponsored emails and guarantees delivery of important messages to your actual inbox rather than promotions or spam.

“Premium Maps” ($6.99/month): Shows routes that aren’t deliberately designed to pass sponsored businesses.

“Premium Android” ($14.99/month): Disables features that were intentionally designed to be confusing or frustrating unless you pay to fix them.

The most ambitious plan, however, appears to be “Premium Internet” ($99.99/month), which would theoretically allow users to experience the internet as it existed before it was optimized for engagement metrics and advertising revenue.

When asked about these rumored services, a Google spokesperson replied, “While we can’t comment on future products, we’re always exploring ways to enhance the user experience through innovative monetization strategies that create value for our advertising partners while maintaining the illusion of user agency.”

The Search Resistance: A Small But Growing Movement

Not everyone is embracing Google’s new premium model. A small but growing segment of users has begun migrating to alternative AI search platforms like Perplexity, which saw a 47% increase in traffic following Google’s announcement.

“I finally reached my breaking point when I searched for ‘symptoms of appendicitis’ and had to scroll past four ads for appendix-shaped throw pillows before I could find medical information,” explained former Google user Sam Mitchell. “By that point, my appendix had actually ruptured, which I suppose is the ultimate bounce-back to the search results page.”

Meanwhile, digital rights advocate Jennifer Patel has organized what she calls the “Search Liberation Front,” a movement dedicated to helping users break their Google dependency. “We run support groups where people learn to perform basic tasks like finding a recipe without first being shown 17 different Air Fryers they could purchase,” she explained. “The withdrawal symptoms can be severe – one man experienced panic attacks when he realized DuckDuckGo doesn’t know his location within three feet at all times.”

Whether these resistance efforts will impact Google’s dominant market position remains to be seen. As one analyst noted, “Google has achieved what economists once thought impossible: they’ve made their service progressively worse while simultaneously increasing both user numbers and revenue. It’s like a restaurant making their food gradually more expensive and less tasty, yet somehow attracting more customers who are willing to pay extra for slightly less terrible meals.”

Have you already received your Premium Search invitation, or are you still stuck with the peasant version where you have to scroll past seventeen shopping ads before you can learn if that rash is serious? Will you be shelling out $9.99 a month to slightly reduce the commercial content in your search results, or have you already joined the search engine resistance? Share your search horror stories or premium experiences in the comments below!

Support TechOnion

If you enjoyed this article and want to support independent tech journalism that doesn't literally charge you to read fewer ads, consider donating to TechOnion. For just $8.99/month (that's $1 less than Google Premium Search!), you can fund our ongoing investigation into whether the internet is actually still there beneath all the advertisements. Your contribution helps ensure we can continue to peel back the layers of tech absurdity without first showing you fourteen different types of vegetable peelers you might want to purchase. Remember: in a world where even Google is charging you to see slightly fewer ads, TechOnion remains committed to showing you exactly zero shopping recommendations for products tangentially related to onions.

The iFold Cometh: Apple Reinvents the Wheel While Steve Jobs Performs 10,000 RPM in His Titanium Mausoleum

By

Simba the "Tech King"

-

May 11, 2025

0

An illustration of the Apple iFold, the foldable iPhone

In a shocking twist that absolutely no one saw coming except literally everyone with a passing interest in consumer technology, Apple plans to release its revolutionary, groundbreaking, paradigm-shifting foldable iPhone in 2026. The device, which industry insiders definitely aren’t calling the “iFold” because that would require Apple’s naming department to experience a genuine creative impulse, will arrive a mere seven years after Samsung first introduced the concept to the market. At this pace, we can expect Apple to invent teleportation approximately 45 years after everyone else has been beaming to work.

According to multiple reports that Apple has neither confirmed nor deployed black-ops teams to suppress, the foldable iPhone will feature a book-style design with a 5.7-inch outer display when closed and an approximately 8-inch screen when unfolded.¹ This marks the first time in history Apple has looked at Samsung’s homework, waited half a decade, and then turned in the same assignment with slightly supposed better handwriting.

Tim Cook’s Grand Vision: Make Products Thinner Until They Literally Disappear

The foldable iPhone will reportedly measure between 4.5mm and 4.8mm when unfolded, continuing Apple’s relentless pursuit of devices so thin they can only be seen when viewed edge-on.² Apple engineers have apparently solved the problem of “physics” and “material strength” by creating a device that, when measured by conventional instruments, technically has negative thickness.

“Our revolutionary foldable has the structural integrity of tissue paper but costs as much as a used car,” said a Apple executive while rhythmically tapping on a MacBook made of recycled aluminum and the tears of repair technicians. “We’ve invested billions in creating a hinge so sophisticated that it will absolutely, positively not break unless you look at it wrong, breathe near it, or attempt to use it for its intended purpose.”

Industry analysts speculate that the device will incorporate titanium and stainless steel in its hinge mechanism, presumably so that when it inevitably breaks, you can melt it down and recover at least $15 worth of precious metals from your $2,500 investment.³

Apple’s Bold New Pricing Strategy: “What If We Just Charged More?”

Speaking of that price tag, multiple reports suggest the foldable iPhone will retail between $2,000 and $2,500, making it the most expensive iPhone ever and cementing Apple’s position as the only company that can convince consumers that paying mortgage-level prices for a phone is perfectly reasonable.⁴

“Our market research indicates that many Apple customers still have functioning kidneys, which represents an untapped revenue stream,” explained a Apple CFO while bathing in a tub of liquid cash. “The $2,500 price point was carefully calculated based on the maximum amount we can charge before people start questioning their life choices, multiplied by the blind Apple brand loyalty coefficient.”

When asked why the foldable would cost more than twice as much as the standard iPhone, the executive smiled knowingly. “We’ve added a hinge. Do you have any idea how expensive hinges are? They’re practically extinct in the wild. We had to breed them in captivity.”

The Launch Schedule Shuffle: “It’s Not Confusing If You’re Rich Enough”

In what tech journalists are describing as “a spreadsheet nightmare,” Apple plans to completely revamp its iPhone launch strategy to accommodate the foldable device. Starting in 2026, the company will release the iPhone 18 Pro models, a mysterious “Air” variant, and the foldable in fall 2026, while delaying the standard iPhone 18 until spring 2027.

This staggered release schedule – which would require an advanced degree in Apple Product Management to comprehend – is reportedly designed to “streamline” the broader six-model iPhone lineup.⁵ Because nothing says “streamlined” like splitting your flagship product launch across two separate seasons of the year.

“We found that having a single, easy-to-understand product launch each year was causing dangerous levels of customer satisfaction,” said a Apple marketing director. “Our new approach ensures that no matter when you buy an iPhone, you can immediately experience the crushing regret of knowing a better one is coming out in six months.”

The company’s internal research apparently shows that customer confusion leads to panic buying of the most expensive model available, in a psychological phenomenon economists call “just make it stop pricing.”

The Face ID Vanishing Act: “We Put It Under the Display Because We Can”

In addition to folding innovations, the 2026 iPhone Pro models will reportedly feature under-display Face ID technology, with the facial recognition hardware embedded beneath the screen. This breakthrough allows Apple to shrink the Dynamic Island cutout to a small pill or hole in the top-left corner, in what engineers are calling “Dynamic Peninsula” or possibly “Dynamic Archipelago” depending on which marketing focus group responds better.

“We’ve managed to hide the Face ID sensors under the display,” boasted a conjectural Apple engineer. “Not because anyone asked for it or because it meaningfully improves the user experience, but because Samsung did it and we needed something else to mention in the keynote besides the fold.”

When questioned about potential reliability issues with the hidden sensors, the engineer nodded thoughtfully. “Oh, they’ll absolutely be less reliable. But they’ll be less reliable elegantly.”

The Courage to Follow: Apple’s Bold New Direction of Going Where Others Have Been

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Apple’s foldable plans is the company’s breathtaking courage to follow in the footsteps of nearly every other major smartphone manufacturer. After watching Samsung, Motorola, Google, and various Chinese companies pioneer and refine foldable technology since 2019, Apple has finally decided the concept is sufficiently mature to receive the blessing of its marketing department.⁶

“We believe foldables represent the future of smartphones,” declared an apocryphal Apple VP of Innovation while adjusting his perfectly circular glasses. “Not the past future, which was five years ago when everyone else released them, but the future future, which is when we decide to acknowledge their existence.”

When reminded that Samsung is already on its sixth generation of foldable phones, the executive smiled thinly. “Yes, but have they charged $2,500 for one and called it ‘magical’? Checkmate!”

The iPad Division’s Existential Crisis: “We’re In Danger, Aren’t We?”

The most fascinating aspect of this development is Apple’s apparent willingness to cannibalize iPad sales, breaking with its historical approach of maintaining clear boundaries between product categories.

“For years, Apple told us touchscreen Macs would never happen because they would hurt iPad sales,” explained industry analyst Victoria Richards. “Now they are making a phone that unfolds into an iPad. It’s like watching a strict vegetarian order a 40-ounce ribeye while explaining they have always been a carnivore.”

The iPad division is reportedly in a collective state of panic. “I just got people to start using this thing for actual work instead of just watching Netflix in bed,” lamented an iPad product manager into their locally-sourced kombucha. “Now they’re going to fold a phone in half and call it an iPad killer? I should have taken that job at Microsoft.”

When asked about the potential impact on iPad sales, an Apple executive deflected. “The iFold – I mean, the foldable iPhone – creates an entirely new product category. It’s not a phone. It’s not a tablet. It’s a… phablet. Wait, no, Samsung used that name. It’s a… foldy-phone-pad-thing. Our marketing department is still workshopping it.”

The $700 Million Crease Solution: “It’s Not a Crease, It’s a Feature”

One area where Apple genuinely appears to be innovating is in solving the dreaded “crease problem” that has plagued foldable displays. Reports indicate that Apple’s foldable will feature a display that appears crease-free to the human eye, thanks to a development effort that likely cost more than the GDP of Mauritius.

“We’ve spent approximately $700 million eliminating the crease,” bragged an Apple materials scientist. “Not because it affected functionality in any meaningful way, but because it offended Jony Ive’s ghost, which still haunts our design studio despite him having left the company years ago and being very much alive.”

The solution reportedly involves a proprietary combination of ultra-thin glass, nanopolymers, and the tears of Android users who paid $1,800 for first-generation foldables that broke within a week.

The 20th Anniversary Gift: A Completely Different Philosophy

In what can only be described as cosmic timing, Apple’s second-generation foldable is set to launch in 2027 – exactly twenty years after Jobs unveiled the original iPhone. This perfect symmetry suggests either brilliant marketing or that Tim Cook has discovered time travel.

“For the 20th anniversary of the product that changed everything, we wanted to create something special,” an Apple executive might say. “So we decided to completely abandon its foundational principles and make it fold in half. It’s poetic, really.”

The irony isn’t lost on tech historians who recall Jobs’ original iPhone presentation, where he mocked other phones for having too many buttons and moving parts. Two decades later, Apple’s solution appears to be adding the most significant moving part possible: a massive hinge that transforms their sleek monolith into what is essentially two phones stuck together with industrial-strength tape.

“Steve always said the consumer doesn’t know what they want until we show it to them,” said Tim Cook’s evil twin, Jim Cook. “We’ve updated that to: The consumer doesn’t know what they want until Samsung shows it to them, they buy it, and then we make a slightly more polished version five years later and charge double.”

What do you think? Will you be mortgaging your home to purchase the Apple iFold when it arrives in 2026? Will Steve Jobs complete his transformation into a perpetual motion machine? Has Apple finally run out of ideas, or is this genuinely the next evolution of the smartphone? Comment below with your hottest takes on Apple’s bendable future.

And if this article gave you a chuckle, consider donating to TechOnion-we need the funds to develop a foldable newsletter that's thinner, lighter, and three times more expensive than reading it on your phone.

NewsHub

The HyperVerse of Extraordinary Deception

Why Dig for Gold When You Can Sell Shovels That Don’t Exist?

Dubai: Where Financial Regulations Go for Vacation

How to Spot a Crypto Scammer in the Wild

The SEC: Always On Time, If You Define “On Time” as “After Everyone’s Money Is Gone”

The Resurrection Tour: Sam Lee’s 2025 Comeback Special

Celebrity Endorsements: The Cameo Economy

The Economics of Modern Ponzi Schemes

The Regulatory Game of Whack-a-Mole

The Next Generation: Crypto Scam Innovation

Victims Left Holding the Empty Digital Wallet

The Eternal Return

DONATE TO TECHONION: Because Someone Has to Keep the Billionaires Honest

References

The Death of Search (As Reported By Search)

LEO: Because Apparently We Needed Another Way to Pay Tech Companies

AI Hallucinations: A Feature, Not a Bug (For Creative Content)

Will.I.AM’s Secret AI Master Plan

CCCER: The Secret Framework That Already Doesn’t Work

Google’s Plan B: If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Buy ‘Em (Then Beat ‘Em)

The Creative Renaissance: Not Dead Yet

SEO Professionals: Pivoting Faster Than a Silicon Valley Startup

References

The Technical Marvels of Self-Repossession

The Psychological Aftermath of Vehicular Abandonment

Tesla’s Novel Approach to Customer Relations

A Feature Suspiciously Close to Fiction

The Secondary Market Nightmare

The Future of Autonomous Financial Enforcement

The Human Element

Support TechOnion’s Autonomous Journalism Fund

References

From Meme to Mainstream: The Gospel According to Saint Karpathy

The Five Sacred Skills of Vibe Enlightenment

Principles of Agentic Code Development (Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Trust the Black Box)

Technical Debt? More Like Technical Credit Score

Silicon Valley’s Ouroboros: The Job Eating Itself

From Developer to Digital Shaman

The Skeptics’ Corner: Voices Crying in the Digital Wilderness

The Educational-Industrial Complex Strikes Again

Support TechOnion’s Vibe Journalism

References

The Science of Slow: How Deep Research Works (Or Appears To)

From Prompt to PhD: The Democratization of Expertise

Vibesearch™: The Future of Not Really Looking Things Up

The Computational Economics of Delayed Gratification

The End of Human Thought? (Sponsored by Microsoft)

The Future is Deep, or at Least Labeled That Way

Support TechOnion’s Deep Journalism

References

The Perfect Digital Ouroboros: Learning Without Actually Learning

The “Educational Tool” vs. “Homework-Doing Service” Semantic Dance

The Curious Case of the Skills That Weren’t Developed

The AI-to-AI Educational Future: A Closed Loop of Non-Learning

The Elementary Truth: Education Requires Struggle

The Hallucination Economy: Silicon Valley’s Newest Growth Sector

How To Monetize Your Google-Induced Existential Crisis

The Training Data Behind The Madness

The Hidden Psychological Toll On Bug Hunters

The Corporate Reputation Damage Control Machine

The Competitive Landscape of AI Delusions

The Future: Hallucination as a Feature, Not a Bug

Support TechOnion

The AI Shopping Apocalypse: When Algorithms Become Better Capitalists Than You

“The Cloud” – Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Someone Else’s Overpriced Computer

Tariff-ic News: When Even Stacked Inventory Can’t Save You

The Secret Sauce That Made Amazon… That Nobody Talks About

The Revenge of the Merchants

In Conclusion: The Future Is Here, It’s Just Unevenly Distributed (And Mostly Not In Your Favor)

References

The Premium Search Experience: Like Regular Search But With 17% More Internet

The Science of Search Degradation: A Journey of Discovery

The Tiered Subscription Model: Choose Your Own Financial Adventure

The AI Justification: Computing Power Doesn’t Grow on Trees (Except in Our Carbon Offset Programs)

The True Cost of Free: Your Data, Your Soul, and Now Your Credit Card

The Curious Case of the Search Engine That Stopped Searching

The Future of Premium Search: Your Grandchildren Will Never Believe Search Was Once Free

The Search Resistance: A Small But Growing Movement

Support TechOnion