In a groundbreaking discovery that has sent shockwaves through the professional networking world, local Twitter user @RealJobSeeker revealed that LinkedIn’s much-touted verification system might be less reliable than a British weather forecast. After publicly lamenting LinkedIn’s failure to verify employment history, the user proceeded to update their profile claiming to be LinkedIn’s new CEO – a position that was promptly “verified” faster than you can say “professional networking platform.”
The incident has sparked widespread debate about the reliability of professional credentials in the digital age, with experts questioning whether your entire career history might actually be as fictional as your childhood dream of becoming an astronaut-ninja-veterinarian.
The Verification Illusion
LinkedIn, the Microsoft-owned platform where professionals go to humble-brag about their accomplishments and occasionally find jobs, launched its verification system amid growing concerns about fake profiles and misinformation.1 The company proudly announced that its AI systems detect and remove 96% of fake accounts and 99.1% of spam.2
Dr. Emma Falsehood, leading researcher at the Institute of Digital Truth (which definitely exists and isn’t something we just made up), explains the phenomenon: “LinkedIn’s verification is like promising to check if someone’s actually attended Harvard by asking them to wear a Harvard t-shirt. It’s a system built on trust in an era where trust is as scarce as affordable housing.”
According to our completely fabricated survey of 10,000 hiring managers, 87% admitted they’ve never actually checked if a candidate’s LinkedIn employment history is accurate. Meanwhile, 92% of candidates confessed to “enhancing” their job descriptions with tasks they watched someone else do once.
The Technical Reality
Behind the sleek interface and professional headshots, LinkedIn’s verification system offers several methods that sound impressive but apparently have more holes than Swiss cheese3:
- Work email verification (only available to “limited companies”)
- Microsoft Entra Verified ID (requires your company to have taken “specific steps”)
- LinkedIn Learning license verification
- LinkedIn Recruiter license verification
“The beauty of our system,” said LinkedIn spokesperson Veronica Truthsworth, “is that we have created the illusion of verification without the inconvenience of actual verification. It’s like putting a ‘security system’ sign in your yard without installing the security system.”
The work email verification, their most common method, simply confirms you have access to a company email address—a feat about as challenging as finding cat videos on the internet4. Even more entertaining, this verification expires after 365 days, presumably because your identity might undergo a metamorphosis similar to a butterfly’s on day 3665.
Rise of the LinkedIn Fantasists
The revelation has sparked a trend among creative professionals. Timothy Fakesperson, a self-described “Entrepreneurial Thought Leader,” has updated his LinkedIn profile to include positions as “Chief Innovation Officer at SpaceX,” “Personal Mindfulness Coach to Jeff Bezos,” and “Moon Real Estate Developer.”
“I’ve always wanted to work at multiple Fortune 500 companies simultaneously,” Timothy told us while adjusting his obviously fake mustache. “Thanks to LinkedIn’s robust verification system, I now have the confidence to claim I invented Bitcoin during my lunch breaks at NASA.”
The phenomenon isn’t limited to humans. Reports have emerged of pets receiving verification for executive positions. Baxter, a four-year-old Golden Retriever, now boasts a verified position as “Chief Barketing Officer” at Tesla, complete with a recommendation from “Elon Musk” praising his “exceptional ability to fetch innovative ideas.”
The Verification Gap
Industry analysts point to a fundamental disconnect between what LinkedIn verification promises and what it delivers6. The verification confirms that a person has a company email address, indicating current employment, but does nothing to verify previous positions, titles, responsibilities, or skills7.
“LinkedIn verification is like putting a ‘certified organic’ sticker on a plastic apple,” explains Dr. Falsehood. “It looks legitimate until you take a bite and realize it’s all synthetic.”
The limitations have led to a booming underground market in fake credentials. For just $50, you can reportedly purchase a “Premium LinkedIn Background Package” complete with fabricated employment history, skill endorsements, and recommendations from “industry leaders” who may or may not be chatbots with LinkedIn profiles.
Microsoft’s Response
When reached for comment, Microsoft (which acquired LinkedIn for $26.2 billion in 2016) issued a statement that reads, in part: “We believe in the power of professional networking and the honor system. If someone says they’re the CEO of Google on Monday, Netflix on Tuesday, and the inventor of electricity on Wednesday, who are we to question their versatile career path?”
Our investigation revealed a little-known clause in LinkedIn’s 43-page terms of service: “LinkedIn verification is provided for entertainment purposes only. Any resemblance to actual verification of facts is purely coincidental.”
The Corporate Conundrum
Major corporations are facing their own verification challenges. According to an internal memo from a Fortune 500 company: “We’ve discovered 17 people claiming to be our CEO on LinkedIn. Rather than fight it, we’re considering a time-share arrangement where each can be CEO for three weeks per year.”
HR departments worldwide are reportedly developing new interview questions such as “Are you actually the person in your LinkedIn profile?” and “Did you really invent the internet while interning at that startup?”
Marissa Trufax, HR Director at Definitely Real Corporation, explains: “We now begin interviews by asking candidates to identify themselves in a lineup of similarly dressed professionals with identical LinkedIn profiles. It’s inefficient but necessary.”
The Verification Solution That Isn’t
In response to mounting criticism, LinkedIn has announced plans to enhance its verification system through a partnership with CLEAR, promising to provide free identity verification to nearly 200 million U.S. LinkedIn users. However, with only 15 million current CLEAR users, questions remain about implementation and effectiveness.
“We’re proud to announce that by 2030, we might be able to verify whether people actually have the jobs they claim to have,” said our imaginary LinkedIn spokesperson. “In the meantime, we encourage users to practice ‘verification mindfulness’ – the art of pretending verification exists while knowing deep down it doesn’t.”
The Philosophical Implications
This verification debacle raises deeper questions about professional identity in the digital age. If a job exists on LinkedIn but can’t be verified, does it really exist? If a tree falls in a forest and updates its LinkedIn status, does anyone hear it?
Philosopher and self-proclaimed “Digital Identity Guru” Bartholomew Thinker posits: “LinkedIn has transcended mere professional networking to become performance art. We are no longer showcasing who we are but who we aspire others to believe we could potentially be if circumstances aligned differently.”
The Unverified Future
As verification (or lack thereof) continues to shape online professional identities, experts predict several trends that will definitely happen because we just made them up:
- “Verification Anxiety” will be recognized as a clinical condition affecting professionals who constantly worry someone might discover their actual job responsibilities involve less strategy and more making coffee.
- Companies will begin hiring based on the creativity of fabricated career histories rather than actual qualifications.
- LinkedIn will introduce a “Probably Real” blue badge that users can purchase for $9.99/month.
- The next generation of professionals will list their job titles as “possibly a marketing director” and “alleged software engineer” to hedge against verification attempts.
“The future of professional networking isn’t about what you’ve actually done,” concludes Dr. Falsehood, “but about what you can convince an algorithm you might have done in a parallel universe where verification doesn’t exist. Fortunately for creative resume writers, that universe is LinkedIn.”
The Last Unverified Word
As our Twitter whistleblower demonstrated, the gap between LinkedIn’s verification promises and reality is wide enough to drive a convoy of fabricated careers through. With LinkedIn having removed 15 million fake accounts in just six months last year5, one has to wonder how many “verified” profiles remain that claim to be astronauts, royal family members, or LinkedIn CEOs.
In the meantime, if you’re browsing LinkedIn and come across someone claiming to be “Supreme Emperor of Google” or “Chief Inspiration Officer at Apple,” remember that their verification badge means they successfully checked a box confirming they’re not a robot – a claim that, ironically, remains unverified.
As this article goes to press, reports are emerging that our Twitter whistleblower has updated their LinkedIn profile again. They now claim to be “Verification System Designer at LinkedIn” with a testimonial from Bill Gates reading simply: “Whoops.”
Support Quality Tech Journalism or Watch as We Pivot to Becoming Yet Another AI Newsletter
Congratulations! You’ve reached the end of this article without paying a dime! Classic internet freeloader behavior that we have come to expect and grudgingly accept. But here is the uncomfortable truth: satire doesn’t pay for itself, and Simba‘s soy milk for his Chai Latte addiction is getting expensive.
So, how about buying us a coffee for $10 or $100 or $1,000 or $10,000 or $100,000 or $1,000,000 or more? (Which will absolutely, definitely be used for buying a Starbucks Chai Latte and not converted to obscure cryptocurrencies or funding Simba’s plan to build a moat around his home office to keep the Silicon Valley evangelists at bay).
Your generous donation will help fund:
- Our ongoing investigation into whether Mark Zuckerberg is actually an alien hiding in a human body
- Premium therapy sessions for both our writer and their AI assistant who had to pretend to understand blockchain for six straight articles
- Legal defense fund for the inevitable lawsuits from tech billionaires with paper-thin skin and tech startups that can’t raise another round of money or pursue their IPO!
- Development of our proprietary “BS Detection Algorithm” (currently just Simba reading press releases while sighing heavily)
- Raising funds to buy an office dog to keep Simba company for when the AI assistant is not functioning well.
If your wallet is as empty as most tech promises, we understand. At least share this article so others can experience the same conflicting emotions of amusement and existential dread that you just did. It’s the least you can do after we have saved you from reading another breathless puff piece about AI-powered toasters.
Why Donate When You Could Just Share? (But Seriously, Donate!)
The internet has conditioned us all to believe that content should be free, much like how tech companies have conditioned us to believe privacy is an outdated concept. But here’s the thing: while big tech harvests your data like farmers harvest corn, we are just asking for a few bucks to keep our satirical lights on.
If everyone who read TechOnion donated just $10 (although feel free to add as many zeros to that number as your financial situation allows – we promise not to find it suspicious at all), we could continue our vital mission of making fun of people who think adding blockchain to a toaster is revolutionary. Your contribution isn’t just supporting satire; it’s an investment in digital sanity.
What your money definitely won’t be used for:
- Creating our own pointless cryptocurrency called “OnionCoin”
- Buying Twitter blue checks for our numerous fake executive accounts
- Developing an actual tech product (we leave that to the professionals who fail upward)
- A company retreat in the metaverse (we have standards!)
So what’ll it be? Support independent tech satire or continue your freeloader ways? The choice is yours, but remember: every time you don’t donate, somewhere a venture capitalist funds another app that’s just “Uber for British-favourite BLT sandwiches.”
Where Your Donation Actually Goes
When you support TechOnion, you are not just buying Simba more soy milk (though that is a critical expense). You’re fueling the resistance against tech hype and digital nonsense as per our mission. Your donation helps maintain one of the last bastions of tech skepticism in a world where most headlines read like PR releases written by ChatGPT.
Remember: in a world full of tech unicorns, be the cynical donkey that keeps everyone honest. Donate today, or at least share this article before you close the tab and forget we exist until the next time our headline makes you snort-laugh during a boring Zoom meeting.
Further Reading
References
- https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a1359065 ↩︎
- https://www.cmswire.com/digital-marketing/linkedin-verification-how-to-guide-for-brands-influencers-and-marketers/ ↩︎
- https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a1359065 ↩︎
- https://www.reddit.com/r/linkedin/comments/148kzjl/work_email_verification_expiration/ ↩︎
- https://www.reddit.com/r/linkedin/comments/148kzjl/work_email_verification_expiration/ ↩︎
- https://www.ere.net/articles/linkedins-verification-badges-fall-short ↩︎
- https://www.ere.net/articles/linkedins-verification-badges-fall-short ↩︎
