“Technology makes promises it can’t keep, but remote controls keep promises they never made.” – Ancient Tech Proverb.
In a world where your refrigerator can order milk, your watch can detect heart attacks, and your virtual assistant can accidentally order a $300 doll house when your toddler says something that vaguely sounds like “Alexa,” one technological relic stubbornly refuses to evolve: the humble remote control.
The average American home contains 6.4 remote controls, each with approximately 47 buttons, of which the typical user understands the function of exactly 4.2. This mathematical relationship, known as the “Button-to-Comprehension Ratio,” remains one of the greatest unsolved mysteries in consumer electronics, right up there with “Why do wireless headphones die precisely when your flight takes off?”
The Remote Renaissance: A Study in Technological Resilience
Despite predictions of their demise, remote controls aren’t going anywhere. Remote Controls Industry analysts project the global market will grow by an impressive 105% from 2025 to 20331. This astonishing resilience begs the question: WHY?
“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” explains Dr. Henrietta Clicksworth, Head of Obsolete Technology Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Button Pushing. “Infrared remote technology is simple, robust, low-tech and extremely widely established. It just works.”2
This explanation, while technically accurate, fails to address the philosophical underpinnings of our collective remote addiction. Why, when we have smartphones that can launch satellites, do we still gravitate toward plastic rectangles with rubber buttons that sometimes work if you point them at precisely the right angle while standing on one foot and reciting the alphabet backward?
According to a recent study by the International Foundation for Remote Control Psychology (IFRCP), humans derive a deep psychological satisfaction from the tactile experience of pressing buttons – a satisfaction that swiping and voice commands simply cannot replicate.
“The click of a remote button sends a surge of dopamine to the brain equivalent to receiving 18.7 Instagram likes,” states the study’s lead researcher, Dr. Benjamin Pressington. “We’ve become buttoholics, and technology companies know it.”
The Buttondemic: A Global Crisis
The proliferation of remote controls has reached epidemic proportions. The typical living room entertainment system now requires an average of 3.8 remote controls to operate effectively, leading to what experts have termed “Remote Clutter Anxiety Disorder” (RCAD).3
“I have six different remotes, and the on/off button has three different locations,” laments Mark Remoteson, a 42-year-old systems analyst from Poughkeepsie. “Three use a circle or box around the button, others use distinct button colors, and one has a recessed button. It’s anarchy.”
This chaotic lack of standardization has spawned a thriving underground economy of universal remote controls, each promising to be the last remote you’ll ever need – a promise that has been made and broken more times than New Year’s resolutions.
Revolutionary Solution or Just Another Remote?
Enter ZapMaster 9000, the latest entrant in the universal remote wars. This sleek device promises to control everything from your TV to your garage door to your neighbor’s sprinkler system (with or without their knowledge).
“We’ve created the world’s first AI-powered, quantum-encrypted, blockchain-based universal remote,” boasts ZapMaster CEO Chad Buttleton. “It features 247 buttons, a touch-sensitive orbital trackpad, voice recognition in 17 languages, and a dedicated ‘Find Netflix’ button that glows in the dark.”
When asked why they didn’t simply create an app for smartphones instead, Buttleton appeared physically ill. “Apps? APPS? Do you have any idea how satisfying it is to mash a physical button when you’re angry at a TV show? Try rage-swiping on a touchscreen and tell me how that works for you.”
The Silent War: Voice Control vs. Button Pushers
Voice-activated assistants like Amazon’s Alexa, Google Home, and Apple’s Siri have attempted to musclewhat the media has dubbed “Big Button” out of the home control market. Yet, they’ve achieved only limited success.
“Currently, key factors holding back the broad adoption of voice-enabled remote controls are cost, infrastructure, and technology,” explains tech analyst Miranda Voicewell. “Cost is a hugely motivating factor for manufacturers and product designers.”4
But there’s another factor at play: privacy. A recent survey by RemoteTruth.org found that 78% of consumers are “somewhat uncomfortable” to “actively paranoid” about having devices constantly listening to their conversations.
“Without any interaction from a remote control, a TV would have to be listening to recognize your voice directly at all times,” notes privacy advocate Timothy Buttonsworth. “While some TVs are capable of this, the always-listening aspect has raised user concerns about privacy and security.”
Moreover, voice commands lack the precision of button pushing. As one frustrated voice control user put it: “I asked Alexa to ‘turn up the volume a little bit,’ and my neighbors called the police.”
The Remote Resistance: Luddites or Visionaries?
A growing movement known as the “Button Preservation Society” (BPS) has emerged, advocating for the continued existence of physical remote controls as a bulwark against complete AI domination.
“Remote controls are humanity’s last line of defense,” insists BPS founder Theodore “Two Thumbs” Johnson. “When the AI uprising begins, and your smart home turns against you, what are you going to do? Talk to it? It won’t listen. But a remote control with IR technology? That’s analog warfare, baby!”
Johnson’s paranoia might seem extreme, but he raises an interesting point about technological dependency. As our homes become increasingly “smart,” we become increasingly vulnerable to system failures, hacks, and the whims of corporate software updates.
“If a single centralized remote can control all of your electronic devices, all data entered could be at risk,” warns cybersecurity expert Alicia Buttondown. “Hackers could gain access to any device being controlled by the remote and access all passwords, private information, and more.”5
The Future of Remote Control: Beyond the Button
Despite these concerns, innovation in remote control technology continues apace. Microsoft’s SmartGlass turns tablets and smartphones into remote touchpads for Xbox navigation. Samsung has integrated gesture control, with small cameras that track movement, allowing users to wave their hands to control volume and menu selection.
Peter Docherty, founder and CTO of personalized content recommendations engine provider ThinkAnalytics, believes remotes will evolve rather than disappear: “There’s no one best way to do everything – the remote has a place for channel zapping and controlling functions with shortcut buttons. Even with voice, you can still speak into the remote.”
But the most revolutionary development might be what experts are calling “cognitive interoperability” – the ability of different devices to work together seamlessly not just on a technical level but on a user experience level.
“Users would never accept a consumer electronics product that wouldn’t let them run a standard cable from one box to another to transfer video or audio signals,” explains UX researcher Dr. Helena Clickmann. “In today’s world, cognitive interoperability is just as important as technical interoperability.”
Conclusion: Pushing Forward By Holding On
As we stand at the crossroads of technological evolution, the humble remote control serves as both an anchor to our past and a window into our future. It reminds us that sometimes, the simplest solution is still the best one – a physical object that does exactly what it’s supposed to do, mostly, when you point it in the right direction, usually.
Perhaps the remote control’s greatest contribution to humanity isn’t its functionality but its metaphorical significance: a reminder that sometimes we need to step back, point ourselves in the right direction, and push a button to make things happen.
So the next time you find yourself frantically searching through couch cushions for that missing remote, take a moment to appreciate this strange technological anachronism. In a world increasingly controlled by algorithms and artificial intelligence, there’s something profoundly human about pressing a button and watching something happen.
As renowned techno-philosopher Sir Button Pushington III once said, “In the grand cosmic theater of existence, we are all just remote controls, desperately searching for the right button to press before our batteries run out.”
Editor’s Note: This article was written by a human with 27 remote controls and a mild case of button-pushing addiction.
Support Quality Tech Journalism or Watch as We Pivot to Becoming Yet Another AI Newsletter
Congratulations! You’ve reached the end of this article without paying a dime! Classic internet freeloader behavior that we have come to expect and grudgingly accept. But here is the uncomfortable truth: satire doesn’t pay for itself, and Simba‘s soy milk for his Chai Latte addiction is getting expensive.
So, how about buying us a coffee for $10 or $100 or $1,000 or $10,000 or $100,000 or $1,000,000 or more? (Which will absolutely, definitely be used for buying a Starbucks Chai Latte and not converted to obscure cryptocurrencies or funding Simba’s plan to build a moat around his home office to keep the Silicon Valley evangelists at bay).
Your generous donation will help fund:
- Our ongoing investigation into whether Mark Zuckerberg is actually an alien hiding in a human body
- Premium therapy sessions for both our writer and their AI assistant who had to pretend to understand blockchain for six straight articles
- Legal defense fund for the inevitable lawsuits from tech billionaires with paper-thin skin and tech startups that can’t raise another round of money or pursue their IPO!
- Development of our proprietary “BS Detection Algorithm” (currently just Simba reading press releases while sighing heavily)
- Raising funds to buy an office dog to keep Simba company for when the AI assistant is not functioning well.
If your wallet is as empty as most tech promises, we understand. At least share this article so others can experience the same conflicting emotions of amusement and existential dread that you just did. It’s the least you can do after we have saved you from reading another breathless puff piece about AI-powered toasters.
Why Donate When You Could Just Share? (But Seriously, Donate!)
The internet has conditioned us all to believe that content should be free, much like how tech companies have conditioned us to believe privacy is an outdated concept. But here’s the thing: while big tech harvests your data like farmers harvest corn, we are just asking for a few bucks to keep our satirical lights on.
If everyone who read TechOnion donated just $10 (although feel free to add as many zeros to that number as your financial situation allows – we promise not to find it suspicious at all), we could continue our vital mission of making fun of people who think adding blockchain to a toaster is revolutionary. Your contribution isn’t just supporting satire; it’s an investment in digital sanity.
What your money definitely won’t be used for:
- Creating our own pointless cryptocurrency called “OnionCoin”
- Buying Twitter blue checks for our numerous fake executive accounts
- Developing an actual tech product (we leave that to the professionals who fail upward)
- A company retreat in the metaverse (we have standards!)
So what’ll it be? Support independent tech satire or continue your freeloader ways? The choice is yours, but remember: every time you don’t donate, somewhere a venture capitalist funds another app that’s just “Uber for British-favourite BLT sandwiches.”
Where Your Donation Actually Goes
When you support TechOnion, you are not just buying Simba more soy milk (though that is a critical expense). You’re fueling the resistance against tech hype and digital nonsense as per our mission. Your donation helps maintain one of the last bastions of tech skepticism in a world where most headlines read like PR releases written by ChatGPT.
Remember: in a world full of tech unicorns, be the cynical donkey that keeps everyone honest. Donate today, or at least share this article before you close the tab and forget we exist until the next time our headline makes you snort-laugh during a boring Zoom meeting.
References
- https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/remote-controls-market-report ↩︎
- https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/ne1ul4/eli5_why_do_some_products_like_tv_remotes_still/ ↩︎
- https://www.nngroup.com/articles/remote-control-anarchy/ ↩︎
- https://ambiq.com/blog/with-smart-devices-everywhere-why-are-our-remote-controls-so-dumb/ ↩︎
- https://pannam.com/blog/remote-control-infographic/ ↩︎
