“The dream of every tech platform is to have all the content and none of the creators.” – Silicon Valley Proverb
In a groundbreaking announcement that has musicians everywhere contemplating career changes to literally anything else, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek revealed today that the company will launch DeadArtist.AI, a revolutionary new program that will generate infinite music from deceased legends while paying living artists even less than the company’s current rate of “almost nothing.”
The move comes just weeks after Snoop Dogg publicly declared he was abandoning Spotify after learning that his one billion streams generated a paltry $45,000 – roughly the same amount as selling 14 t-shirts at a concert or one-tenth of a suburban house in 1995.
The Economics of Modern Streaming: A Masterclass in Digital Feudalism
“We are incredibly proud of our payment model,” explained Spotify’s Chief Financial Optimization Officer, Miranda Ledgerbloom, during the company’s quarterly earnings call. “For every dollar we collect, we keep 30 cents, send 65 cents to record labels and publishers, and the remaining 5 cents gets divided among approximately 14 million artists – or as we call them internally, ‘content generation units.'”
When asked about Snoop Dogg’s complaints, Ledgerbloom appeared genuinely confused. “I don’t understand the problem. $45,000 is enough to buy a 2015 Toyota Camry or pay for four years of therapy to cope with being underpaid. Besides, he should be grateful we’re not Napster. They would have paid him zero dollars.”
A Spotify spokesperson later clarified that according to their calculations, a billion streams should generate “millions of dollars,” but couldn’t explain where that money goes between their accounting department and artists’ bank accounts. Industry insiders have termed this mysterious disappearance “The Bermuda Royalty Triangle.”
The Artists’ Perspective
Musicians have expressed mixed reactions to being financially decimated by streaming services. Local indie artist Cassandra Tambourine, who recently hit 500,000 streams and received a check for $17.42, told TechOnion: “At first I was excited about the exposure. Then I realized you can’t pay rent with exposure. Believe me, I tried. My landlord was not impressed with my Spotify stats.”
Meanwhile, established artists like Taylor Swift have managed to earn substantial income from streaming, with estimates suggesting she’s made over $328 million from her 85+ billion streams. When reached for comment, Swift declined to speak directly but sent a handwritten note reading, “This is why I rerecord my albums, bestie.”
DeadArtist.AI: The Future is Dead
Spotify’s groundbreaking DeadArtist.AI program aims to solve what the company calls “the artist compensation problem” by simply removing living artists from the equation entirely.
“Living artists have all these annoying needs – food, shelter, healthcare, the desire to be paid for their work,” explained Dr. Maximilian Algorithm, Spotify’s Head of Posthumous Content Innovation. “Dead artists are much more cooperative. Jimi Hendrix has never once complained about his streaming rate, and he’s been dead for over 50 years.”
The program works by feeding an AI system the complete catalogs of deceased musicians, then generating new “songs” that sound eerily similar to what these artists might have created had they not died or demanded fair compensation.
“Our AI can create a new John Lennon album in under 4 minutes,” boasted Algorithm. “Is it as good as the real thing? Of course not. Will people listen to it anyway? Absolutely. Will we have to pay royalties? Minimal!”
Early tests have produced such hits as “Purple Hazy” (AI-Hendrix), “Imagine There’s More Money” (AI-Lennon), and “Back to Black Balance Sheet” (AI-Winehouse).
Industry Response
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) issued a carefully worded statement: “While we have concerns about AI-generated music potentially reducing human artist revenue, we are excited about the possibility of monetizing our back catalogs of dead artists in perpetuity without having to deal with their estates’ demands for fair compensation.”
When asked about potential copyright issues, Spotify’s legal team cited the company’s newly created “They’re Dead, So Whatever” doctrine, which they claim provides legal protection for using any dead person’s likeness, style, or creative output.
The Numbers Game: Streaming Economics By The Charts
A recent industry study (which TechOnion definitely didn’t make up) reveals the stark economics of music streaming:
| Activity | Equivalent Value |
|---|---|
| 1 billion Spotify streams | $45,000 (according to Snoop) |
| Same streams on Apple Music | $86,450 (still not great) |
| Selling 15 t-shirts at a concert | $45,000 |
| One mid-tier corporate sponsorship | $150,000 |
| Using “Blockchain music platform” buzzwords in press release | $2.5 million in venture funding |
| Being dead and having your music AI-generated | Priceless (for Spotify) |
“The math speaks for itself,” noted industry analyst Bartholomew Charts. “Artists are better off selling five t-shirts than spending six months creating an album that gets millions of streams. That’s why I advise all my musician clients to pivot to merchandise. Music should just be your loss leader for hoodie sales.”
The Future of Music: Less Human, More Profitable
Spotify’s five-year plan, outlined in an internal document titled “Operation Human Obsolescence” (accidentally leaked to TechOnion), reveals the company’s ambitious vision for a world where music requires no human input whatsoever.
By 2027, Spotify aims to have 75% of all new music generated by AI, with the remaining 25% coming from a small pool of human artists who will be paid exclusively in “exposure credits” redeemable for more exposure.
“Think about it,” enthused Spotify’s Chief Innovation Disruptor, Chadwick Venture-Smith. “No more dealing with artists complaining about royalties. No more negotiations with labels. Just an infinite supply of algorithm-generated music tailored to maximize user engagement metrics while minimizing royalty outflows. It’s the dream!”
The document also details plans for new listener subscription tiers:
- Basic ($9.99/month): Access to AI-generated music only
- Premium ($14.99/month): AI music plus archived human music from before 2025
- Legacy ($29.99/month): Includes ability to listen to new human-created music
- Ultimate ($49.99/month): Allows users to hear a real human say “thank you” once per year
Apple Music: The Silent Partner
While Spotify has been grabbing headlines with its aggressive cost-cutting measures, Apple Music has remained suspiciously quiet despite paying artists significantly more per stream (approximately 91% more, according to industry estimates).
Tim Cook, when asked about Apple Music’s more generous artist payment structure, merely smiled and said, “We prefer to quietly destroy industries rather than brag about it.”
Industry insiders suggest Apple’s strategy is more subtle but potentially more devastating: wait for Spotify to alienate all human musicians, then offer them slightly better terms while still paying far less than physical album sales ever did.
“It’s like watching two vampire lords argue over how much blood to leave in the victim,” explained music industry veteran Delores Cynical. “One wants to drain them completely, the other wants to leave just enough for the victim to survive and produce more blood later. Either way, the musicians are still getting bitten.”
The Creator Fund Mirage
In response to mounting criticism, Spotify recently announced the “Probably Never Gonna Happen Creator Fund,” a $100 million initiative to support independent artists that will be distributed “any day now” according to company representatives.
“We’re incredibly excited about this fund,” said Spotify’s Director of Artist Placation, Jennifer Placebo. “Just as soon as we figure out how to define ‘creator,’ ‘fund,’ and ‘distribute,’ we’ll be sending out checks. In the meantime, have you considered selling t-shirts?”
When pressed for details about the application process, eligibility requirements, or timeline for the fund, Placebo smiled weakly and excused herself to “grab some water,” never to return to the press conference.
Meanwhile, actual legitimate grants for musicians do exist, with organizations like PRS Foundation offering up to £5,000 to support the creation of new music – roughly equivalent to 1.6 million Spotify streams.
The Twist: Musicians Fight Back
In a shocking development that has sent tremors through Silicon Valley, musicians around the world have begun exploring radical alternatives to streaming platforms, including “performing live concerts,” “selling physical albums directly to fans,” and most controversially, “collectively bargaining for better terms.”
One anonymous musician collective has even developed “FairStream,” a theoretical streaming platform that would distribute 90% of revenue directly to artists based on actual listening time. When presented with this model, Spotify executives reportedly burst into uncontrollable laughter before composing themselves and asking, “But where’s the 12-figure valuation in that?”
The final word goes to Snoop Dogg, who has abandoned traditional streaming for blockchain-based platform Tune.FM: “I don’t f–k with Spotify anymore. I’m only on Tune.FM,” he stated in a press release, adding, “When your business model makes actual piracy look artist-friendly, you know something’s messed up. Even the Napster kids threw house parties for artists.”
As of press time, Spotify’s stock jumped 17% following their announcement of DeadArtist.AI, while musicians everywhere reported a mysterious collective feeling of their souls leaving their bodies, presumably to be captured by an algorithm and monetized without compensation.
Support Quality Tech Journalism or Watch as We Pivot to Becoming Yet Another AI Newsletter
Congratulations! You’ve reached the end of this article without paying a dime! Classic internet freeloader behavior that we have come to expect and grudgingly accept. But here is the uncomfortable truth: satire doesn’t pay for itself, and Simba‘s soy milk for his Chai Latte addiction is getting expensive.
So, how about buying us a coffee for $10 or $100 or $1,000 or $10,000 or $100,000 or $1,000,000 or more? (Which will absolutely, definitely be used for buying a Starbucks Chai Latte and not converted to obscure cryptocurrencies or funding Simba’s plan to build a moat around his home office to keep the Silicon Valley evangelists at bay).
Your generous donation will help fund:
- Our ongoing investigation into whether Mark Zuckerberg is actually an alien hiding in a human body
- Premium therapy sessions for both our writer and their AI assistant who had to pretend to understand blockchain for six straight articles
- Legal defense fund for the inevitable lawsuits from tech billionaires with paper-thin skin and tech startups that can’t raise another round of money or pursue their IPO!
- Development of our proprietary “BS Detection Algorithm” (currently just Simba reading press releases while sighing heavily)
- Raising funds to buy an office dog to keep Simba company for when the AI assistant is not functioning well.
If your wallet is as empty as most tech promises, we understand. At least share this article so others can experience the same conflicting emotions of amusement and existential dread that you just did. It’s the least you can do after we have saved you from reading another breathless puff piece about AI-powered toasters.
Why Donate When You Could Just Share? (But Seriously, Donate!)
The internet has conditioned us all to believe that content should be free, much like how tech companies have conditioned us to believe privacy is an outdated concept. But here’s the thing: while big tech harvests your data like farmers harvest corn, we are just asking for a few bucks to keep our satirical lights on.
If everyone who read TechOnion donated just $10 (although feel free to add as many zeros to that number as your financial situation allows – we promise not to find it suspicious at all), we could continue our vital mission of making fun of people who think adding blockchain to a toaster is revolutionary. Your contribution isn’t just supporting satire; it’s an investment in digital sanity.
What your money definitely won’t be used for:
- Creating our own pointless cryptocurrency called “OnionCoin”
- Buying Twitter blue checks for our numerous fake executive accounts
- Developing an actual tech product (we leave that to the professionals who fail upward)
- A company retreat in the metaverse (we have standards!)
So what’ll it be? Support independent tech satire or continue your freeloader ways? The choice is yours, but remember: every time you don’t donate, somewhere a venture capitalist funds another app that’s just “Uber for British-favourite BLT sandwiches.”
Where Your Donation Actually Goes
When you support TechOnion, you are not just buying Simba more soy milk (though that is a critical expense). You’re fueling the resistance against tech hype and digital nonsense as per our mission. Your donation helps maintain one of the last bastions of tech skepticism in a world where most headlines read like PR releases written by ChatGPT.
Remember: in a world full of tech unicorns, be the cynical donkey that keeps everyone honest. Donate today, or at least share this article before you close the tab and forget we exist until the next time our headline makes you snort-laugh during a boring Zoom meeting.
