In a bold move that answers the question absolutely no one was asking — “How can we make AI prohibitively expensive?” — Google has unveiled Google AI Ultra, a premium tier of artificial intelligence specifically designed for users who find regular AI embarrassingly affordable. The new offering, priced at what industry insiders describe as “approximately one kidney per token,” represents Google’s strategic pivot toward serving the critically underserved market of people who actively enjoy overpaying for computational services.
The Billionaire’s Digital Butler
Announced at a private event where attendees reportedly had to show both proof of a yacht purchase in Monaco, and at least one space tourism reservation to gain entry, Google AI Ultra promises an “ultra-premium AI experience” that executives insist is “totally different” from the regular Gemini service, though they’ve been conspicuously vague about exactly how.
“Google AI Ultra represents a quantum leap in what AI can do for the discerning user who has more money than computational problems to solve,” explained Dr. Maximilian Price, Google’s newly appointed Chief Wealth Verification Officer. When pressed for specifics about technical improvements over the standard Google AI Pro, Price adjusted his solid gold tie and continued: “The premium user doesn’t ask about specifications. They ask, ‘Is it the most expensive option?’ If the answer is yes, that’s all they need to know.”
According to the product’s elaborately calligraphed press materials (delivered via drone with a small string quartet attached), Max Mode “harnesses the computational equivalent of one trillion digital butlers, each individually trained at Oxford” and “processes requests with the urgency and deference one would expect when paying approximately the GDP of a small island nation per API call.”
Pricing Structure: Because Why Not Just Set Money on Fire?
In what analysts are calling “the logical conclusion of software as a service,” Google’s pricing structure for Google AI Ultra appears designed specifically to ensure that users feel a sense of financial discomfort with each query.
“Our research showed that wealthy tech executives and venture capitalists were experiencing a troubling phenomenon we call ‘affordability anxiety,'” explained Google’s Head of Premium User Psychology, Dr. Veruca Goldencalf. “When technology becomes too accessible, these users feel genuine distress. With Max Mode’s pricing, we ensure they can once again enjoy the soothing reassurance that comes with knowing they’re spending significantly more than necessary.”
The official pricing documentation reveals tiers that would make even luxury brands blush:
- The “Merely Affluent” tier costs $50 per query, with responses delivered within 2 seconds.
- The “Actually Rich” tier runs $250 per query, with responses delivered within 1 second and addressed to “Your Excellency.”
- The “Genuinely Wealthy” tier costs $1,000 per query, with responses delivered “before you even finish thinking the question” and includes having a Google employee personally call you to whisper “good choice” after each API call.
- The “Oligarch” tier, priced at “call for quote,” reportedly includes having Sundar Pichai personally send you a thumbs-up emoji after particularly expensive days of usage.
Learning from the Masters of Arbitrary Pricing
Industry observers note that Google appears to be taking direct inspiration from OpenAI’s playbook of “pricing based on vibes rather than costs.” Last year, OpenAI shocked developers by increasing API prices for GPT-4 by approximately 700%, while offering an explanation that amounted to “because we can.”
“Google has clearly studied the OpenAI school of economic theory, which holds that the value of an AI model is directly proportional to how much anxiety it causes in developers’ accounting departments,” explained tech industry analyst Martha Margins. “It’s a brilliant strategy, really. Make minor improvements to your model, add some marketing language about ‘enhanced capabilities,’ and multiply the price by a number you saw in a dream. The beauty is that customers can’t prove you wrong because nobody actually understands how these models work anyway.”
Internal documents leaked to TechOnion reveal that Google executives specifically cited “the OpenAI Paradox” in strategy meetings, referring to the phenomenon where “higher prices actually increase perceived value, even when the underlying product remains functionally identical.”
What’s Actually Different: A Forensic Investigation
After extensive testing involving several remortgaged homes to fund the API calls, TechOnion’s investigation has uncovered the true differences between standard Gemini Pro and the wallet-obliterating Google AI Ultra. These differences include:
- The addition of the word “Indeed” to approximately 37% more responses, lending an air of sophistication that Google’s research determined “makes rich people feel heard.”
- A proprietary algorithm that detects when you’re showing the AI’s output to colleagues or friends, triggering it to use unnecessarily complex vocabulary and obscure references to philosophers even it doesn’t fully understand.
- A special “wealth signaling” feature that subtly inserts references to exclusive experiences into responses, ensuring the AI never recommends restaurants without Michelin stars or vacation destinations accessible by commercial airlines.
- Responses that take exactly 3% longer to generate — a delay that product managers refer to as “premium hesitation” which creates the impression of deeper thinking.
Perhaps most telling was a line in the technical documentation describing Google AI Ultra’s core enhancement: “Standard responses filtered through seven layers of markup pricing, with no discernible change to output quality.”
The Target Demographic: People Who Think “Budget” Is a Rental Car Company
Google’s market research, conducted entirely at helipad waiting lounges and exclusive members-only clubs, identified several key user personas for Google AI Ultra:
- Tech executives who feel physically ill when using products available to their own employees.
- Venture capitalists who need AI that’s expensive enough to justify putting it on the “innovation research” expense line of their quarterly reports.
- Hereditary billionaires who have never experienced the character-building disappointment of seeing “insufficient funds” on an ATM receipt.
“Our ideal customer doesn’t ask what Google AI Ultra does better,” explained Jason Goldplating, Google’s SVP of Premium User Acquisition. “They simply ask why anyone would choose something that isn’t the most expensive option. These are people who have their assistants hire other assistants to check if their first set of assistants is performing adequately. Price sensitivity isn’t just absent from their psychology; it’s actively repulsive to them.”
A focus group participant, speaking on condition of anonymity because “exclusivity is its own reward,” shared their perspective: “When I use regular Gemini, I can physically feel my social standing drop. My bathroom scales actually show that I lose four pounds of pure status. With Google AI Ultra, I gain it all back plus the warm glow of knowing the person next to me at the coffee shop is using peasant-tier AI.”
The Surprisingly Honest Marketing Campaign
Perhaps the most refreshing aspect of Google’s Google AI Ultra launch is its surprisingly forthright advertising campaign. Billboards in upscale neighborhoods simply state: “Google AI Ultra: Because You’ve Run Out of Other Ways to Feel Special.”
The television commercial, which airs exclusively during yacht races and polo matches, features a silver-haired man in a bespoke suit nodding appreciatively at his computer screen while a voiceover intones: “You’ve made it. Now your AI should reflect that. Google AI Ultra: It’s exactly the same, but you pay more.”
The company’s digital marketing is equally direct, with targeted ads appearing exclusively for users who have recently purchased first-class airline tickets or searched for “most expensive watch that still looks tasteful.”
“We’re not selling technology anymore,” explained Madison Avenue veteran and campaign designer Tristan Monetize. “We’re selling the warm glow of conspicuous digital consumption. Our most successful ad simply shows the invoice for Google AI Ultra usage with an obscenely large number, followed by the tagline: ‘If you have to ask, you can’t afford to think with it.'”
The Industry Response: A Race to the Top (of Pricing Charts)
Not to be outdone, other AI companies have rushed to announce their own ultra-premium offerings. Anthropic unveiled Claude Luxury Edition, which comes with a physical butler who stands next to your computer and nods approvingly at each response. OpenAI reportedly has plans for “GPT-4 Dynasty Edition,” which requires proof of at least three generations of wealth before allowing access.
“We’re witnessing the logical evolution of the software industry,” explained tech economist Dr. Eleanor Capital. “First, we made software free and monetized user data. Then we moved to subscription models. Now we’ve entered the final phase: charging obscene amounts for essentially identical services but with gold-plated marketing. The beautiful part is that by making it outrageously expensive, you actually increase demand among a certain demographic.”
Industry rumors suggest that several startups are now developing AI models that literally do nothing except charge the user’s credit card, with early beta testers reporting “an unprecedented feeling of exclusivity and satisfaction.”
The Final Analysis: A New Definition of “Value”
What, ultimately, does Google AI Ultra tell us about the state of AI in 2025? Perhaps it’s that we’ve moved beyond the quaint notion that technology should solve problems or provide utility proportional to its cost.
“In the early days of computing, we had this naive idea that technology should democratize access to information and capabilities,” reflected industry veteran and AI ethicist Dr. Jonathan Principle. “What Google has brilliantly realized is that there’s far more money in doing the opposite: creating artificial scarcity and status hierarchies in what is essentially an infinitely reproducible digital service.”
As one anonymous Google engineer confided to TechOnion: “Look, the model is exactly the same. We just changed some config files to make it more expensive and added code that checks the user’s billing tier before deciding how many adjectives to use. But here’s the wild part: users on Google AI Ultra report significantly higher satisfaction scores. They genuinely believe they’re getting better results because they’re paying more. In a way, the most impressive AI we’ve built is the one that convinced people to pay luxury prices for standard compute.”
As our investigation concluded, we received word that Google is already planning the next tier above Google AI Ultra, tentatively called “Google AI Infinite,” which will require users to sign over their firstborn child and prove descent from at least one royal bloodline. Early access is expected to begin next quarter.
Has your company implemented Google AI Ultra yet? Are you enjoying the warm feeling of digital superiority that comes from paying exorbitant fees for standard computational services? Or perhaps you’ve found creative ways to make your standard-tier AI appear more expensive to impress colleagues? Share your experiences in the comments below!
DONATE TO TECHONION: Support Journalism That Costs Less Than One Google AI Ultra API Call
If you enjoyed this exposé of premium-priced digital stratification, consider donating to TechOnion. For less than the cost of asking Google AI Ultra to compose a haiku about your investment portfolio, you can fund an entire month of investigative journalism that pulls back the curtain on Silicon Valley’s most ridiculous excesses. We promise to use your donation efficiently – unlike certain AI services we’ve just written about. Remember: TechOnion delivers the same hard-hitting analysis as major tech publications, but without the need for venture capital funding or a family office to afford the subscription.
