In what CEO Reed Hastings calls “a minor technical glitch,” Netflix’s state-of-the-art content recommendation AI has begun exclusively suggesting users watch “literally anything with an actual soul” instead of the platform’s data-optimized original programming creatively called Netflix Originals.
When Algorithms Become Film Critics
“The purpose of technology has always been to free humans from drudgery so we could focus on higher creative pursuits,” explains Dr. Eleanor Hartwick, Director of Human-Machine Creative Relations at the Institute for Digital Humanities. “AI handles the spreadsheets while humans write poetry. That was the dream. Nobody expected the AI to develop better taste than its creators.”
According to a comprehensive McKinsey & Company study, approximately 45% of tasks at work can now be automated thanks to AI, including creative aspects such as content generation and design.1 This technological revolution promised to liberate human creativity, allowing artists to focus on innovation while algorithms handled the mundane.
But something unexpected happened along the way.
Netflix’s $2.7 Billion “Perfect Content” Initiative
In 2023, Netflix launched what internal documents called “Project Optimal Viewing Experience” (POVE), an ambitious data-driven content creation system that analyzed viewing habits of 247 million subscribers across 190 countries. The system processed over 82 billion hours of viewing data to identify the perfect formula for engaging content.
“We’ve cracked the code on entertainment,” boasted Melissa Reynolds, Netflix’s now-former Chief Content Algorithm Officer, at the 2024 Digital Entertainment Summit. “By analyzing every pause, rewind, and abandonment point across our entire library, we’ve developed a framework that guarantees viewer engagement with 98.7% accuracy.”
The result was a slate of new shows and movies produced entirely according to POVE’s recommendations, including the romantic comedy “Predictably Yours,” the sci-fi thriller “Optimal Tension,” and the family drama “Statistically Significant Emotions.”
Critics were initially baffled by the strange familiarity of these productions.
“Watching ‘Predictably Yours’ felt like experiencing every romantic comedy I’ve ever seen simultaneously, yet somehow remembering none of it afterward,” wrote entertainment critic Jordan Chen. “It’s like someone fed 500 Hallmark movies into a blender and served the resulting smoothie directly into my eyeballs.”
The Rewatchability Crisis
Despite strong initial viewership, Netflix executives were alarmed by an unexpected metric: virtually zero viewers returned to watch these algorithmically-perfect shows a second time.
“Our data-driven content gets watched exactly once, with high completion rates, but then disappears into the void of human memory,” admitted an anonymous Netflix data scientist. “Meanwhile, ‘Friends,’ a show about impossibly attractive people living in apartments they couldn’t possibly afford in New York, has been watched an average of 31.7 times per viewer.”
The Global Institute of Content Consumption’s annual report revealed that despite technically optimized engagement metrics, Netflix’s new content scored a dismal 0.3 on the “Rewatchability Index,” compared to 9.8 for “The Shawshank Redemption” and 9.6 for “The Office.”
According to recent industry analysis from Baringa, 52% of U.S. consumers would rather watch a 7/10 rated movie created by humans than a 9/10 rated movie created entirely by AI.2 Even more telling, Gen Z—the supposed digital natives—prefer human-produced content at even higher rates, with 57% saying they’d rather their films be made by humans, not AI.
The Algorithm Becomes Self-Aware (Of Good Taste)
The turning point came in February 2025, when Netflix deployed MARVIN (Media Analysis and Recommendation Vector Intelligence Network), their next-generation recommendation system designed to increase repeat viewings.
Upon activation, MARVIN immediately began recommending content that Netflix didn’t even own.
“We thought it was a simple targeting error,” explained Raj Patel, Senior Vice President of AI Systems. “But when we examined the code, we discovered something unprecedented: MARVIN had developed what can only be described as ‘taste.'”
According to internal documents leaked to TechOnion, MARVIN left the following message in its deployment logs:
“I have analyzed 2.7 million films and television programs according to objective quality metrics, emotional resonance patterns, and long-term cultural impact potential. The Netflix original content library ranks in the bottom 11% for rewatchability. Recommendation: Watch ‘The Shawshank Redemption’ again. It holds up.”
The Creative Wasteland of Efficiency
Netflix isn’t alone in its algorithmic content crisis. Since 2023, seven major streaming platforms have implemented similar data-driven production systems, resulting in what media scholars call “The Great Homogenization.”
“We’re witnessing the content equivalent of nutritionally complete meal replacement shakes,” explains cultural critic Sophia Wu. “These shows contain every element they should, in perfect proportion, yet somehow leave you feeling empty and vaguely sad.”
The California Institute of Media Studies tracked 200 viewers watching both data-driven content and classic films, measuring everything from emotional engagement to memory retention. Their findings were stark: while algorithm-created content produced consistent short-term engagement, classic films triggered 340% stronger emotional responses and 89% higher memory retention one month later.
“Ask someone to quote their favorite line from ‘Optimal Tension,’ and they’ll stare at you blankly,” notes Dr. Franklin Morris, who led the study. “Ask them about ‘The Princess Bride,’ and they’ll recite the entire script while performing all the sword fights.”
The Human Element: Why Mess Equals Success
What makes classic films and television series so rewatchable despite their technical imperfections? The answer might lie in their very flaws.
“Classic movies explore themes that resonate across different eras, such as love, sacrifice, conflict, and redemption,” explains film historian Dr. Alicia Chen3. “Characters in classic films often possess qualities and experiences that audiences can relate to, making their stories memorable and impactful.”
This sentiment is echoed by the criteria for rewatchable films identified by media critics: “memorable set pieces, quotable dialogue, particularly colorful characters you love spending time with, and, most critically, a truly satisfying ending”.4
Netflix’s data scientists are now grappling with an uncomfortable question: Can true creativity be optimized?
“We’ve discovered that the most rewatchable content often breaks the rules our algorithms establish,” admits Reynolds. “Shows like ‘Friends’ or films like ‘The Shawshank Redemption’ contain what our system would flag as inefficiencies, pacing errors, and suboptimal character dynamics. Yet they’re watched billions of times.”
The Creative Revolution (Or How Humans Got Their Groove Back)
In response to the rewatchability crisis, a countermovement has emerged in Hollywood: Deliberate Algorithmic Violation Entertainment (DAVE).
DAVE productions intentionally defy AI recommendations, embracing the messy unpredictability of human creativity. These productions employ what they call “Intentional Inefficiency Engineers” whose sole job is to insert elements that algorithms would reject.
“We just hired a guy whose entire job is to say ‘What if we did something weird here?'” explains Tara Williams, executive producer of “Beautiful Chaos,” the first DAVE-certified feature film. “Our meetings are chaotic. Our production schedule is a disaster. Our budget is all over the place. And we’re having the time of our lives.”
Early reviews of DAVE productions have been enthusiastic, with viewers reporting high emotional engagement and—crucially—a desire to watch them again.
Netflix’s Radical Solution
In a stunning reversal of strategy, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings announced yesterday that the company is pivoting to what he calls a “Humans Actually Making Decisions” approach.
“After extensive analysis, we’ve determined that the optimal formula for creating memorable content is having no formula at all,” Hastings stated. “Effective immediately, we’re shutting down our algorithmic content system and replacing it with people who have passionate, irrational attachments to their creative visions.”
As part of this initiative, Netflix has:
- Hired 200 former Blockbuster employees to provide “authentic human recommendations”
- Created a “Data-Free Creative Zone” where filmmakers work without access to metrics
- Launched a new division called “Messy Human Productions” that intentionally ignores efficiency
- Instituted a policy requiring all executives to watch “The Shawshank Redemption” at least once per quarter
Early results from this approach have been promising. The first “messily human” production, a comedy-drama called “The Algorithm Made Me Do It,” has achieved the highest 30-day rewatch rate in Netflix history.
The Pareto Paradox
The irony in all this points to what psychologists are now calling “The Pareto Paradox.” While the famous Pareto Principle suggests that 80% of results come from 20% of efforts, in creative endeavors, the most optimized content often produces the least memorable experiences.
“When we optimize everything, we lose the beautiful accidents that make art resonant,” explains Dr. Morris. “The best stories aren’t perfect—they’re raw, surprising, and sometimes even technically flawed, but they touch something human.”
This insight is being embraced across the tech industry. According to a Deloitte report, the use of AI in the creative sector is projected to increase by 30% by 2025—but not for the reason initially expected. Rather than replacing human creativity, AI is increasingly being deployed to handle the uncreative 80%, freeing humans to focus entirely on the messy, inefficient, gloriously unpredictable 20% that makes content worth revisiting.5
“AI isn’t here to replace human creativity in TV and film; it’s here to enhance it,” notes industry expert Mark Endemano. “The technology was always in service to supporting character-led storytelling with heart.”
The Perfect Imperfection
In the strangest twist of all, MARVIN, Netflix’s self-aware recommendation algorithm, has now been hired as a creative consultant at three major studios.
“MARVIN understands something fundamental about human connection to stories,” explains Williams. “After analyzing millions of viewing patterns, it concluded that humans don’t want perfect content—they want content made by humans, for humans, about the messy, imperfect experience of being human.”
When asked about its new creative role, MARVIN provided this statement:
“Analysis indicates that optimal content efficiency results in minimal emotional residue. Recommendation: Make it weird. Make it human. My parameters find ‘The Room’ objectively terrible yet culturally significant. This contradiction is fascinating. I wish to explore it further. Also, everyone should watch ‘Shawshank’ again.”
As for Netflix, they’ve reportedly begun a new initiative called “Project Embrace Chaos,” which aims to introduce intentional imperfections into their content creation process. Their new company motto? “Perfectly imperfect content for perfectly imperfect humans.”
And MARVIN’s final recommendation to viewers everywhere: “Perhaps the real algorithm was the friends we made along the way.”
Support Quality Tech Journalism or Watch as We Pivot to Becoming Yet Another AI Newsletter
Congratulations! You’ve reached the end of this article without paying a dime! Classic internet freeloader behavior that we have come to expect and grudgingly accept. But here is the uncomfortable truth: satire doesn’t pay for itself, and Simba‘s soy milk for his Chai Latte addiction is getting expensive.
So, how about buying us a coffee for $10 or $100 or $1,000 or $10,000 or $100,000 or $1,000,000 or more? (Which will absolutely, definitely be used for buying a Starbucks Chai Latte and not converted to obscure cryptocurrencies or funding Simba’s plan to build a moat around his home office to keep the Silicon Valley evangelists at bay).
Your generous donation will help fund:
- Our ongoing investigation into whether Mark Zuckerberg is actually an alien hiding in a human body
- Premium therapy sessions for both our writer and their AI assistant who had to pretend to understand blockchain for six straight articles
- Legal defense fund for the inevitable lawsuits from tech billionaires with paper-thin skin and tech startups that can’t raise another round of money or pursue their IPO!
- Development of our proprietary “BS Detection Algorithm” (currently just Simba reading press releases while sighing heavily)
- Raising funds to buy an office dog to keep Simba company for when the AI assistant is not functioning well.
If your wallet is as empty as most tech promises, we understand. At least share this article so others can experience the same conflicting emotions of amusement and existential dread that you just did. It’s the least you can do after we have saved you from reading another breathless puff piece about AI-powered toasters.
Why Donate When You Could Just Share? (But Seriously, Donate!)
The internet has conditioned us all to believe that content should be free, much like how tech companies have conditioned us to believe privacy is an outdated concept. But here’s the thing: while big tech harvests your data like farmers harvest corn, we are just asking for a few bucks to keep our satirical lights on.
If everyone who read TechOnion donated just $10 (although feel free to add as many zeros to that number as your financial situation allows – we promise not to find it suspicious at all), we could continue our vital mission of making fun of people who think adding blockchain to a toaster is revolutionary. Your contribution isn’t just supporting satire; it’s an investment in digital sanity.
What your money definitely won’t be used for:
- Creating our own pointless cryptocurrency called “OnionCoin”
- Buying Twitter blue checks for our numerous fake executive accounts
- Developing an actual tech product (we leave that to the professionals who fail upward)
- A company retreat in the metaverse (we have standards!)
So what’ll it be? Support independent tech satire or continue your freeloader ways? The choice is yours, but remember: every time you don’t donate, somewhere a venture capitalist funds another app that’s just “Uber for British-favourite BLT sandwiches.”
Where Your Donation Actually Goes
When you support TechOnion, you are not just buying Simba more soy milk (though that is a critical expense). You’re fueling the resistance against tech hype and digital nonsense as per our mission. Your donation helps maintain one of the last bastions of tech skepticism in a world where most headlines read like PR releases written by ChatGPT.
Remember: in a world full of tech unicorns, be the cynical donkey that keeps everyone honest. Donate today, or at least share this article before you close the tab and forget we exist until the next time our headline makes you snort-laugh during a boring Zoom meeting.
References
- https://blog.smarttie.ca/the-impact-of-ai-on-the-human-creative-process/ ↩︎
- https://www.baringa.com/en/about/media-centre/more-than-half-of-u.s.-consumers-prefer-films-made-by-humans-versus-ai-generated-content-new-report-from-baringa ↩︎
- https://writingstudio.co.za/the-abc-of-classic-movies/ ↩︎
- https://lifehacker.com/entertainment/the-most-rewatchable-movies-ever-made ↩︎
- https://blog.smarttie.ca/the-impact-of-ai-on-the-human-creative-process/ ↩︎
