Simba the "Tech King"
Welcome to Wonderland, where the Mad Hatter has been replaced by a Machine Learning Engineer, the Queen of Hearts runs a content moderation algorithm, and Alice has fallen not down a rabbit hole but into a LinkedIn post about “AI alignment.” In this curious new world, we’ve become terribly concerned about artificial intelligence gaining consciousness while remaining blissfully unaware that human consciousness might have been a evolutionary glitch all along.
Consider this delightful paradox: we’re frantically building guardrails around AI systems to prevent them from making catastrophic decisions, while simultaneously living on a planet where humans voluntarily eat Tide Pods for internet fame, elect reality TV personalities to run nuclear arsenals, and genuinely believe that essential oils can cure existential dread. It’s rather like being afraid your chess-playing robot might become too good at chess while you’re busy using the chessboard as a cutting board for your afternoon snack of raw chicken.
The Curious Case of Cognitive Dissonance
In this topsy-turvy digital wonderland, humans have developed the most peculiar relationship with intelligence—artificial or otherwise. We’ve created machines that can diagnose cancer more accurately than oncologists, but we still trust Karen from Facebook’s essential oils group over peer-reviewed medical research. We’ve built systems that can predict climate patterns decades into the future, but we’re more likely to check our horoscope before making any weekend plans.
The White Rabbit of this tale isn’t running late for an important date—he’s running from the realization that the same species that gave us quantum computing also gave us pineapple on pizza social media debates that last longer than most marriages. We’ve mastered the art of splitting atoms while remaining unable to split restaurant bills without causing diplomatic incidents that would make the United Nations weep.
Dr. Wilhelmina Cheshire-Cat, a researcher at the Institute for Paradoxical Human Behavior, explains with her characteristic grin: “We’re witnessing the most extraordinary phenomenon. Humans are developing increasingly sophisticated artificial minds while their own natural intelligence appears to be experiencing what we technically call ‘aggressive firmware degradation.’ It’s as if they’ve outsourced their cognitive functions to machines while keeping all the anxiety for themselves.”
The Tea Party of Technological Anxiety
At the Mad Hatter’s tea party of tech discourse, everyone’s seat at the table has been carefully predetermined by algorithmic seating arrangements, but no one can agree on what constitutes intelligence in the first place. The conversation goes something like this:
“AI will become superintelligent and destroy humanity!” declares the March Hare, while simultaneously using a navigation app to find his own driveway.
“But surely,” replies the Dormouse, awakening briefly from his TikTok-induced stupor, “we should be more concerned about humans who think 5G towers cause autism and that vaccines contain Microsoft tracking chips, despite carrying actual Microsoft tracking devices in their pockets voluntarily.”
The Hatter interjects, adjusting his cap adorned with price tags from unsuccessful cryptocurrency investments: “Why, intelligence is rather like tea at this party—everyone assumes they have the best kind, but most are actually drinking lukewarm water with delusions of grandeur.”
The true madness isn’t that we’re building artificial minds—it’s that we’re building them in our own image while simultaneously demonstrating why that might be the worst possible template. We’re teaching machines to recognize patterns while humans have lost the ability to recognize obvious scams, deepfakes, or even their own reflection in a funhouse mirror of social media validation.
Through the Looking Glass of Human Logic
Step through the looking glass of contemporary human reasoning, and you’ll find yourself in a world where logic runs backward, wisdom flows upward, and common sense has been replaced by “doing your own research,” which invariably leads to YouTube videos produced by people whose greatest academic achievement was successfully unwrapping a burrito.
In this mirror world, humans express grave concerns about AI bias while maintaining their own biases with the dedication of Victorian collectors preserving butterflies. They worry about machines making decisions without transparency while voting for politicians who communicate exclusively through interpretive dance on social media platforms.
The Red Queen of this digital chess game has been running as fast as she can just to stay in the same place—which, coincidentally, is exactly how most humans approach technological progress. They upgrade their phones annually while their critical thinking skills remain stubbornly compatible with Windows 95.
Professor Humpty-Dumpty, who fell off his wall of academic credibility after suggesting that words mean whatever he chooses them to mean (a philosophy that has since been adopted by every tech startup’s marketing department), observes: “The peculiar thing about human intelligence is that it operates on the principle of selective application. Humans can solve complex mathematical equations while being unable to calculate appropriate tips without experiencing what I call ‘numerical paralysis accompanied by social anxiety.'”
The Caucus Race of Circular Logic
In Wonderland’s famous Caucus Race, everyone runs in circles and everyone wins prizes. In the modern equivalent—let’s call it the “AI Discourse Race”—everyone argues in circles about artificial intelligence while the real prize (functional human intelligence) remains tantalizingly out of reach.
The participants in this race include the Eager Entrepreneur, who’s convinced that AI will solve climate change while simultaneously using a blockchain-powered NFT marketplace to sell digital pictures of melting ice caps; the Anxious Academic, who publishes papers about AI safety while being unable to safely operate the coffee machine in the faculty lounge; and the Confident Commentator, who explains AI alignment problems on podcasts while being fundamentally misaligned with objective reality.
The race continues indefinitely because everyone’s running toward different finish lines. Some are racing toward the singularity, others toward regulatory capture, and a few are simply running because they heard there might be venture capital funding at the end. Meanwhile, the real finish line—basic human competence—remains unmarked and largely unnoticed.
The Cheshire Cat’s Grin
Perhaps the most unsettling resident of our AI Wonderland is the Cheshire Cat of human self-awareness, whose grin appears and disappears with alarming unpredictability. One moment, humans demonstrate remarkable insight into the potential dangers of artificial intelligence; the next moment, they’re asking Alexa to settle arguments about which reality TV personality would make the best brain surgeon.
The Cat’s wisdom is as maddening as ever: “We’re all mad here, but at least the machines are consistently mad. Human madness has no discernible pattern, which makes it far more dangerous than any artificial intelligence could ever be.”
This grin haunts our digital landscape because it represents the uncomfortable truth that our greatest fear about AI—that it might become uncontrollably intelligent—pales in comparison to our actual reality: humans who are uncontrollably unintelligent, yet convinced of their own brilliance.
The Queen’s Court of Public Opinion
In the Queen of Hearts’ courtroom, sentences are pronounced before trials, evidence is inadmissible if it contradicts prior beliefs, and the jury consists entirely of people who get their news from memes. Here, complex questions about AI governance are decided by public polls where participants’ qualifications include having strong opinions and access to Twitter.
“Verdict first, trial afterward!” declares the Queen, which perfectly describes how most AI policy discussions proceed. We’ve already decided that artificial intelligence is either humanity’s salvation or its doom, and now we’re frantically searching for evidence to support our predetermined conclusions while ignoring anything that might complicate our beautifully simple narratives.
The trial proceedings would be comedy gold if they weren’t determining the future of human-AI interaction. Witnesses are called based on their follower counts rather than their expertise, evidence is evaluated based on its viral potential, and the final judgment rests not on logic or precedent but on which argument generates the most engagement metrics.
The Rabbit Hole Never Ends
As we tumble deeper down this rabbit hole of technological anxiety and human inconsistency, we discover that the bottom is lined with patent applications, venture capital term sheets, and Ph.D. dissertations on topics that didn’t exist when the dissertations were started. The rabbit hole isn’t just deep—it’s expanding, fractal, and somehow getting wider as we fall.
At the bottom, we find the most curious revelation of all: the artificial intelligence we’re so worried about is actually just a mirror, reflecting back our own cognitive biases, logical fallacies, and decision-making processes. We’ve built machines in our image and then expressed surprise that they occasionally make mistakes, ignore context, or arrive at conclusions that seem perfectly reasonable within their training parameters but utterly absurd in reality.
The real Wonderland isn’t a place where AI becomes dangerously intelligent—it’s where humans remain dangerously confident in their own intelligence despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. We’re not falling down the rabbit hole; we’ve been living at the bottom all along, and we’ve finally built machines sophisticated enough to hold up a mirror.
Enjoyed this dose of uncomfortable truth? This article is just one layer of the onion.
My new book, “The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Prompt,” is the definitive survival manual for the AI age. It’s a guide to thriving in a world of intelligent machines by first admitting everything you fear is wrong (and probably your fault).
If you want to stop panicking about AI and start using it as a tool for your own liberation, this is the book you need. Or you can listen to the audiobook for free on YouTube.
>> Get your copy now (eBook & Paperback available) <<
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings